Case law

Cook v. Springfield Township

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2023

See generally Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Hicks v. Concorde Career Coll., 449 Fed. App’x 484, 487 (6th Cir. 2011). … Ward v. Cnty. of Cuyahoga, 721 F. Supp. 2d 677, 694 (N.D. Ohio 2010) (citation and quotations omitted); see also Brown v. Whirlpool, 996 F. Supp. 2d 623, 643 (N.D.

Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Dille Road Recycling, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 6, 2022

Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., 475 U.S. at 587). … Further, the Sixth Circuit follows the Board’s test for determining whether and the extent to which the Act preempts State remedies. Id. (quoting New Orleans & Gulf Coast Ry. Co. v.

Taverns for Tots, Inc. v. City of Toledo

307 F. Supp. 2d 933 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 2004

See Recreational Developments of Phoenix, Inc. v. … See Williamson v.

Abboud v. Travelers

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 2022

Guman, 652 N.E.2d 684 at 686 (quoting Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Inds. of Ohio, Inc. 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 (Ohio 1984)). … See Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 F.

Banks, III v. Bianchims

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 31, 2024

See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); Wells v. … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (liberal construction for pro se litigants does not “abrogate basic pleading essentials”).

Griffin

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 14, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath. … Id.; see also Scheid v.

Collins v. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 11

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 2024

Brown, stating “FYI.” (Id.; ECF Doc. 38 (“Brown Depo.”), pp. 27:23-28:16.) Mr. Brown did not recall discussions with Mr. Johnson following his receipt of the email. (Brown Depo., p. 28:17-19.) c. … Passenger Corp. v.

Heimberger v. Repp

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 15, 2020

Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991). … See Dakota v. Brown, Case No. 3: 12 CV 2110, 2012 WL 5378733, at *5 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 31, 2012), citing Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 483 n. 16 (1983); Rooker v.

Griffin v. Grabbowski

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 5, 2024

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath.

Peterson v. Hamsen

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2024

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

Kreszowski v. FCA US LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 21, 2025

See, e.g., Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. … V.

$8,050.00 in U.S. Currency v. United States

307 F. Supp. 2d 922 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 25, 2004

United States v. Search of Music City Mktg., Inc., 212 F.3d 920, 923 (6th Cir.2000) (citations omitted); United States v. Dusenbery, 201 F.3d 763, 768 (6th Cir. 2000); Floyd v. … In Shaw , a woman (Katherine Ann Shaw) was on board a plane at the Memphis Airport when federal agents seized $45,008 from her.

Johnson v. Dana Corp.

236 F.R.D. 349 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 24, 2006

Compare In re Veeco Instruments, Inc., 233 F.R.D. 330, 332-33 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (applying FIFO) (citing Thompson v. … Here, the parties dispute the soundness of LIFO v. FIFO. Each party endorses a methodology that enhances its respective claim to lead plaintiff status. 1. FIFO v.

Johanan v. Broaden

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 22, 2024

Hill v. Lappin, 630 F.3d 468, 471 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding that the dismissal standard articulated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … See, e.g., Saro v. Brown, 11 F. App'x 387, 388 (6th Cir. 2001) (“Violations of these [mail and wire fraud] sections of the federal criminal code do not give rise to independent causes of action.”); United States v.

Stradford v. U.S. Bank

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2023

Lillard v. Shelby Cty. … See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989), abrogated on other grounds, Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769, 772 (6th Cir. 2001) (en banc); Clements v. Brimfield Twp., No. 1:12 CV 1180, 2012 U.S. Dist.

Kurman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 12, 2023

Brown.2 (Tr. 697-702). Dr. Brown indicated Ms. … Brown indicated Ms.

Flack v. Imperial Aluminum - Minerva LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 2024

Doe v. Oberlin Coll., No. 1:17cv1335, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237046, at *6 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2018) (citing cases); see also Crawford v. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 n.2 (6th Cir. 2013).

Reiter v. Midland Ross Corp.

842 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 1, 1992

Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 892 v. N.L.R.B., 712 F.2d 225 , 228 (6th Cir. 1983). In Vaca v. … The state unemployment compensation board decides whether one is eligible, and if so, when the payment shall be made. Ohio Rev.Code §§ 4141.01-4141.32; 43 Pa.Stat. § 751 et seq.

Kaminski v. Chrysler Corp.

983 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 1997

Kaminski’s grievance at the Appeal Board, but International UAW representative Larry Leach later decided to withdraw the grievance. On March 12, 1996, Mr. … Wayda notified the Plaintiff by letter that “[Local UAW] has been informed that your grievance has been withdrawn without precedent at the Appeal Board level.”

Haddon v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2022

Nothing in the City's Ordinances authorizes the Board to grant monetary relief and the City does not argue, nor did the court find, that the Board had the ability to grant monetary relief. … Teamsters Local Union 436 v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 132 Ohio St.3d 47 (2012). In Parratt v.