Case law

Gen. Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 513 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1996

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Gen. Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-287.] … Papushak and William Mitchell, for appellee Parma Board of Education. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 4} In R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

State ex rel. Peabody Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm.

1993 Ohio 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1993

Claimant also suggests that the regional board's silence on the gainful employment issue indicates a rejection of that assertion. In support, claimant cites State ex rel. DeMint v. Indus. … Nye v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 75, 22 OBR 91, 488 N.E.2d 867; State ex rel. Johnson v. Rawac Plating Co. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 599, 575 N.E.2d 837.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfrom

83 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1998

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. WOLFROM. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfrom, 1998-Ohio-418.] … After respondent answered, the matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). {¶ 2} The panel found with respect to count one that in September

Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

1993 Ohio 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1993

Community Concerned Citizens, Inc., Appellant, v. Union Township Board of Zoning Appeals, Appellee. [Cite as Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1993), Ohio St.3d .] … Srovnal v. Linton (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 207, 75 O.O.2d 241, 346 N.E.2d 764.

Corpline v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

97 Ohio St. 3d 1212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2002

CORPLINE, APPELLANT, V. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Corpline v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002-Ohio-5805.] … Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with directions to remand this cause to the Hamilton County Board of Revision to

State ex rel. Carpenter v. Cleveland Chief of Police

1993 Ohio 81 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1993

Claimant also suggests that the regional board's silence on the gainful employment issue indicates a rejection of that assertion. In support, claimant cites State ex rel. DeMint v. Indus. … Nye v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 75, 22 OBR 91, 488 N.E.2d 867; State ex rel. Johnson v. Rawac Plating Co. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 599, 575 N.E.2d 837.

State v. Marian

62 Ohio St. 2d 250 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

In State v. St. Christopher (1975), 305 Minn. 226 , 232 N.W. 2d 798 , the Minnesota Supreme Court held that an analogous statute, Minn. St. 609.175(2), prohibits unilateral as well as traditional conspiracies. … Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. W. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Appellant argues that R. C. 2923.01 does not prohibit unilateral conspiracies because such conspiracies are in essence criminal solicitations.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

76 Ohio St. 3d 95 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1996

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SCURRY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry, 1996-Ohio-268.] … that respondent adhere to the conditions of his two-year probation as set forth by the board.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Misch

82 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1998

Co. v. J.C. Penney Co. (1986), 27 Ohio St.3d 31 , 27 OBR 447, 501 N.E.2d 617 . … Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23, 28 , 1 O.O 313, 315, 193 N.E. 650, 652 ; Akron Bar Assn. v. Miller (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 6, 7 , 684 N.E.2d 288, 290 .

State v. Talley

11 Ohio St. 2d 190 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1967

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Common Pleas Court on authority of Douglas v. California, 372 U. … State v. Catlino, 10 Ohio St. 2d 183 . Judgment reversed. Taxi, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Loyer v. Buchholz

38 Ohio St. 3d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1988

We disagree. “ ‘The primary duty of a court in construing a statute is to give effect to the intention of the Legislature enacting it.’ ” Brown v. … McCord v.

Boles v. Knab

129 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2011

[Cite as Boles v. Knab, 129 Ohio St.3d 222, 2011-Ohio-2859.] BOLES, APPELLANT, v. KNAB, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Boles v. Knab, 129 Ohio St.3d 222, 2011-Ohio-2859.] … See Cleveland v.

Hazel v. Knab

130 Ohio St. 3d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 15, 2011

See Goins v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Corey Hazel, pro se.

Yale v. Case

67 Ohio St. (N.S.) 550 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1903

Judgment affirmed on authority of Patterson v. Lawson, 45 Ohio St., 77 ; Brown v. Whaley, 58 Ohio St., 654 , and Groves v. Groves, 65 Ohio St., 442 . Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Curran v. Brookes

144 Ohio St. 582 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1945

The thought is well expressed by the court in LeBlanc v. Illinois Central Rd. … Orr v. Home Mutual Ins. Co., 12 La. Ann., 255 , 68 Am. Dec., 770 ; Hyde v.

Gruen Watch Co. v. Evatt

143 Ohio St. 461 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1944

In the case of Lehman v. Grantham, 78 N. … Aud. of State, v. Holliday, 61 Ohio St., 352 , 56 N. E., 118 , 49 L. R.

Fisher v. Hasenjager

112 Ohio St. 3d 1404 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2006

The conflict cases are Sckoettle v. Bering (Apr. 22,1996), Brown App. No. CA95-07-011, and Fisher v. Campbell (June 23,1997), Butler App. No. CA96-11-248. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1815, Fisher v.

State ex rel. Freshour v. State

39 Ohio St. 3d 41 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1988

Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42 , 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81 . … Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Muscatello

55 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1978

E. g., State v. Robinson (1954), 161 Ohio St. 213 , 219, 118 N. E. 2d 517 . See, also, State v. Elfrink (1954), 161 Ohio St. 549 , 550-52, 120 N. E. 2d 83 . … Brown, P. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Looker, J., concurs in the judgment. R.

Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.

53 Ohio St. 2d 241 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1978

Steel Works v. Dewey (1881), 37 Ohio St. 242 , 249; State v. Redd (1930), 122 Ohio St. 162, 167 . … Brown, P. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents.