The opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 1212.]
CORPLINE, APPELLANT, V. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.,
APPELLEES.
[Cite as Corpline v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002-Ohio-5805.]
Joint motion to remand sustained.
(No. 2002-1014—Submitted October 15, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 01-A-422.
__________________
{¶1} Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand,
{¶2} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the joint motion to remand be, and
it hereby is, sustained. We acknowledge that under Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v.
Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165, 2002-Ohio-4033, 772 N.E.2d 1160,
the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set
forth in R.C. 5717.01. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the
settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with
directions to remand this cause to the Hamilton County Board of Revision to
implement the mediated agreement of the parties.
{¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their
respective costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax
Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be
certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________
Goodman & Goodman and Stanley Goodman, for appellant.
Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J.
Scheve, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Hamilton County Auditor.
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and David DiMuzio, for appellee Deer Park
School District Board of Education.
__________________
2