Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
Disciplinary Counsel v. Zaccagnini
130 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2011
V(6)(F). … Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDooley v. Barberton Citizens Hospital
11 Ohio St. 3d 216 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1984
See E.P.I. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Basler (1967), 12 Ohio App. 2d 16, 19 [ 41 O.O.2d 60 ]. See, also, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft (1978), 436 U.S. 1, 8 ; Rupe v. Fourman (S.D. Ohio 1981), 532 F. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Hoffman, J., dissents. Hoffman, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for J.P. Celebrezze, J.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire
63 Ohio St. 3d 391 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1992
After a thorough review of the record, we agree with the board as to its findings of fact and conclusions of law, but disagree as to the sanction. Accordingly, we hereby suspend Charles A. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Martin v. Industrial Commision
34 Ohio St. 2d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1973
Hutton, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 9 . … BrowN, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement System
95 Ohio St. 3d 327 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 2002
Here, nothing in the statute or regulations suggests that the SERS retirement board or the members of its medical advisory board must issue a decision [consistent with Noll ].” (Emphasis sic.) State ex rel. Copeland v. … Brown & Margolius, L.P.A., James Mitchell Brown and Rachel C. Wilson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Christopher S.
Cited 10 timesPublished113 Ohio St. 3d 370 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2007
Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A., Geoffrey Stern, Christopher J. Weber, and Rasheeda Z. Khan, for respondent. … Respondent alternatively proposed a public reprimand, which is the sanction the panel and board both recommended. {¶ 17} The parties have not filed objections to the board’s report, and we conclude that a public reprimand
Cited 4 timesPublishedMontgomery County Park District v. Kinney
61 Ohio St. 2d 88 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980
We note the similarity between the relevant facts herein and those addressed by this court in Atwell v. Board of Park Commrs. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 257 . … C. 5709.10, regardless of its use. 5 The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp
48 Ohio St. 3d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1990
We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B), and we adopt the board’s recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished79 Ohio St. 3d 494 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1997
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ALLEN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen, 1997-Ohio-136.] … Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. H.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWillis Day Warehousing Co. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision
128 Ohio St. 3d 1441 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2011
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2006-M-1794 and 2007-M-868. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Ohio St. 2d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1975
All such claims urged by appellant were considered by the board, as its decision reflects, but were deemed insufficient to establish exempt sales or error in the test check. Russo v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished60 Ohio St. 3d 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991
We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years. … V(23).
Cited 1 timesPublishedColumbus Bar Assn. v. Moreland
97 Ohio St. 3d 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2002
COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. MORELAND. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Moreland, 2002-Ohio-6726.] … Respondent thereupon moved that this court remand the case to the board for a hearing so that he could submit evidence in mitigation. We granted the motion. Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board
104 Ohio St. 3d 122 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004
City Bank v. … Simmons-Harris v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Farley
45 Ohio St. 3d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1989
On June 26, 1989, we issued an order requiring respondent to show cause why the recommendation of the board should not be confirmed and the disciplinary order so entered. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Petition for Reinstatement of Atkins
2 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982
Upon a full review of the matter, this court concurs with the recommendation of the board. Therefore, the petition of Arliss P. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSt. Thomas Hospital v. Schmidt
62 Ohio St. 2d 439 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1980
The board has no discretion to refuse such funding when the necessary funds are available. See State, ex rel. Brown, v. Bd. of County Commrs. (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 62 . … Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment. P. Brown, J., dissents. Hofstetter, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1990
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished62 Ohio St. 3d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1991
We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also concur in the board’s recommendation and hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Spiccia v. Abate
2 Ohio St. 2d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1965
Brown, J. … Board of Elections of Hamilton County, 170 Ohio St. 30 ; State, ex rel. Killeen Realty Co., v. City of East Cleveland, 169 Ohio St. 375 . The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Overruled on other grounds by State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea, 7 Ohio St. 2d 85 (1966)Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna