Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wiechel

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 227
  • 581 N.E.2d 522
  • 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2886
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 18, 1991
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 44.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also concur in the board’s recommendation and hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.