Case law

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Siewert

40 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988

V(5). However, in light of respondent’s admitted alcoholism and his stated desire to obtain treatment for it, we believe the board’s recommendation to be in *174 appropriate under the circumstances. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Susco

89 Ohio St. 3d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2000

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SUSCO. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Susco, 2000-Ohio-446.] … Respondent waived his right to a formal hearing, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) considered the matter on stipulated facts. {¶ 2} The panel found

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stinson

25 Ohio St. 3d 130 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

Based upon review of the evidence presented to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, the court concurs in the findings and recommendations of the board. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cook

89 Ohio St. 3d 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2000

V(5)(A)(4). … Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. Mary L.

Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny

10 Ohio St. 3d 110 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1984

Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners. Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent, Richard Joseph Bogomolny, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowersock

44 Ohio St. 3d 170 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1989

Having thoroughly reviewed the instant record, we agree with the board’s finding that respondent committed the misconduct charged in the complaint. We also concur in the board’s recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Gretick v. Jeffrey

12 Ohio St. 3d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1984

There is no evidence or indeed any claim that respondent has been or is serving on the county board of revision. … Corrigan, v. Hensel (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 96 [ 8 O.O.2d 7 ]. For reason of the foregoing, the writ is denied. Writ denied. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sullivan

41 Ohio St. 3d 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1989

This court agrees with the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also concur with the board’s recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Snider v. Limbach

44 Ohio St. 3d 200 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1989

When no competent and probative evidence is developed before the Board of Tax Appeals to show that the Tax Commissioner’s determination of the value of property is factually incorrect, it is error for the board to reverse … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nothstein

21 Ohio St. 3d 108 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1986

Bar Assn. v. McGarry (1979), 60 Ohio St.2d 168 [ 14 O.O.3d 406 ]; Lake County Bar Assn. v. Ostrander (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 93 [ 70 O.O.2d 173 ]. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilson

127 Ohio St. 3d 10 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2010

V(4)(G). … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Skiba v. Connor

5 Ohio St. 3d 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1983

Cadle v. General Motors Corp. (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 28 [ 74 O.O.2d 50 ]; Starr v. Young (1961), 172 Ohio St. 317 [ 16 O.O.2d 105 ]. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents in part and concurs in the judgment. C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

In re Appeal of Suspension of Huffer from Circleville High School

47 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1989

My usual stance is one supportive of the sound exercise of the board’s administrative authority to operate its school program. In this regard see my most recent comments in dissent in the case of Phillips v. … However, I concur with Justice Brown’s statement in his dissent that the facts here do “not lead me to invoke the spectre of ‘the current drug and alcohol crisis.’ ” I am in agreement with Justice Brown that the school board

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Tolliver

62 Ohio St. 3d 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1992

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mason

125 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2010

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mason, 125 Ohio St.3d 29, 2010-Ohio-1467.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MASON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mason, 125 Ohio St.3d 29, 2010-Ohio-1467.] … Bar Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Chacksfield

50 Ohio St. 2d 305 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1977

Therefore, we accept the board’s recommendation, and the respondent is indefimtely suspended from the practice of law. Judgment accordingly. O’Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Lyons v. Northwest Ohio Developmental Center

17 Ohio St. 3d 250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1985

Brown, J. … School Emp. v. Twin Valley Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 178, 181 . Throughout R.C.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowen

38 Ohio St. 3d 323 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1988

However, to adopt the board’s recommended sanction, we *324 would necessarily be required to deviate substantially from the precedent established by this court. … Brown, J.

State Ex Rel. Lane v. City of Pickerington

130 Ohio St. 3d 225 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2011

Network Alliance, Inc. v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would affirm on the basis of State ex rel. Henderson v. Maple Hts.

Blue Cross v. Jump

61 Ohio St. 2d 246 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1980

Brown. JJ., dissent. … See Henry's Cafe v. Board of Liquor Control (1959), 170 Ohio St. 233 , 235-236 (interpreting Andrews v. Board of Liquor Control [1955], 164 Ohio St. 275 ).