Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Tolliver

  • 62 Ohio St. 3d 462
  • 584 N.E.2d 670
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 129
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 5, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.8%

mitigating factors included no prior record of disciplinary action and no harm resulting from respondent’s actions

How later courts described this case

  • mitigating factors included no prior record of disciplinary action and no harm resulting from respondent’s actions
  • a public reprimand was the appropriate sanction for an attorney who represented two clients whose interests were adverse to each other

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.