Case law

State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Board of Hancock County Commissioners

82 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1998

Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 426-427 , 639 N.E.2d 83, 89 . As The Blade concedes, its mandamus claim is moot because the board has now given it a copy of the settlement agreement. State ex rel. … Network v.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Griffith

74 Ohio St. (N.S.) 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1906

We refer this case to the third class and cite as illustrations the following cases: State v. Medary, 17 Ohio, 554; Wilson v. State, 67 Kan., 44; People v. Pennock, 60 N. Y., 421 ; State v. … Bonner, 72 Mo., 387 ; Orton v. City of Lincoln, 156 Ill., 499 ; State v. Moores, 56 Neb., 82 ; County of San Luis Obispo v. Farnum, 108 Cal., 562 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McGinley

55 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1990

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board's findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to the respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Zaffiro

127 Ohio St. 3d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

Bar Assn. v. Zaffiro, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4830.] CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZAFFIRO. [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Shelton v. Board of Education

129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1934

supporting the charges preferred against the relator, that the action of the respondent was wrongful, arbitrary, collusive, contrary to law and not in good faith, and that the relator has no other adequate remedy (Christmann v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Public Utilities Commission

107 Ohio St. (N.S.) 442 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 1923

Clairsville v. Public Utilities Commission, 102 Ohio St., 574 , 132 N. E., 151 , the same thing occurred. In East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of Cleveland, 106 Ohio St., 489 , 140 N. … In Gilchrist v. Waycross St. & Suburban Ry. Co. (D.

State ex rel. Thurston v. Board of Education

140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1942

Bishop v. Board of Education of Mt. Orab Village School Dist., 139 Ohio St., 427 , 40 N. … with each teacher holding a professional, permanent, or life certificate who, at the time of the passage of this act, is completing five or more consecutive years of employment by said board.”

In re Reinstatement of Coogan

35 Ohio St. 2d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1973

A hearing on the petition was subsequently conducted by a panel of three members of the Board of Commissioners pursuant to the provisions of Buie V(20) of the Buies for the Government of the Bar of Ohio. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Robertson v. Board of Education

27 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Co. v. Comm’rs Clinton. County, supra; State v. Van Horne, 7 Ohio St. 327 ; State v. … The limited power of theseboards is considered in Board Education Brown Tp. v. Cheney, 5 Ohio St. 67 . Peremptory writ awarded. Whitman and Johnson, JJ., concurred.

Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Cook

18 Ohio St. 3d 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1985

Respondent was given every opportunity to defend herself at the hearing before the board. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County Commissioners

132 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 2012

White v. … Caspar v.

State ex rel. Flowers v. Board of Education

35 Ohio St. (N.S.) 368 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

Weir v. Day, ante, p. 143. … Co. v. Hall, 91 U. S. 355 ; Pumphrey v. Mayor of Baltimore, 47 Md. 145 . Second.

State ex rel. Geering v. Board of Commissioners

31 Ohio St. (N.S.) 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

. *214 Turnpike Company v. Comm’rs of Sandusky County, 1 Ohio St. 149 ; State ex rel. v. Comm’rs of Warren County, 17 Ohio St. 558 ; State ex rel. v. Comm’rs of Holmes County, 17 Ohio St. 608 ; State ex rel. v. … Comm’rs of Perry County, 5 Ohio St. 497 ; and Supervisors v. United States, 4 Wallace, 435, in support of their position.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Siewert

40 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988

V(5). However, in light of respondent’s admitted alcoholism and his stated desire to obtain treatment for it, we believe the board’s recommendation to be in *174 appropriate under the circumstances. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck

129 Ohio St. 3d 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2011

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck, 129 Ohio St.3d 209, 2011-Ohio-3281.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAUCK. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck, 129 Ohio St.3d 209, 2011-Ohio-3281.] … Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473, 2007-Ohio-5251, 875 N.E.2d 935, ¶ 21. {¶ 10} The panel and board found that respondent’s dishonest motive was an aggravating factor.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. LaVeris

12 Ohio St. 3d 98 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1984

This court has carefully reviewed the record pertaining to the case herein and concurs in the board’s findings of fact pursuant to the matter. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. Landers

61 Ohio St. 3d 88 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1991

We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), and 5-105(B) and (C) as found by the board. We also agree with the penalty and conditions that the board recommended. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. . Letters from respondent and his attorney suggest that respondent has already complied with the condition that he successfully complete a residential alcohol rehabilitation program.

Frankelite Co. v. Lindley

28 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1986

Canton Structural Steel Co. v. Lindley (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 33 [23 O.O. 3d 52]; American Handling Equip. Co. v. Kosydar (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 150 [71 O.O. 2d 120]; Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Wright, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kornowski

24 Ohio St. 3d 50 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1986

V(4). … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Cohodes

9 Ohio St. 3d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1984

evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5), and (6), DR 9-102, DR 9-102(B)(3), and DR 9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and concurs with the recommendation of the board … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.