Opinion

State ex rel. Shelton v. Board of Education

  • 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 157
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 26, 1934
Status
Published
On the bench
Garver, Hart, Jones, Matthias, Stephenson, Weygandt, Williams
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.0%

The opinion

This matter came on for hearing upon the petition of the relator, the answer of the respondent, the evidence and the arguments of counsel.

Upon consideration whereof the court finds that the relator is an officer, that there is no evidence supporting the charges preferred against the relator, that the action of the respondent was wrongful, arbitrary, collusive, contrary to law and not in good faith, and that the relator has no other adequate remedy (Christmann v. Coleman, 117 Ohio St., 1 ).

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue as prayed for by the relator, commanding his restoration to the office of Superintendent of Public Schools of the city of Springfield, Ohio, and that the costs be assessed against the respondent.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., not participating.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.