Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. LaVeris

  • 12 Ohio St. 3d 98
  • 12 Ohio B. 85
  • 465 N.E.2d 457
  • 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1176
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 11, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has carefully reviewed the record pertaining to the case herein and concurs in the board’s findings of fact pursuant to the matter.

As with the numerous cases of alcoholism in the Bar, but for respondent’s drug addiction, all indications are that he was a capable attorney. The respondent has undergone a remarkable rehabilitation in combating his drug problem, and it is hoped that with continued rehabilitation and treatment, he may regain the right to practice law in the state of Ohio.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.