Case law

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Elsass

86 Ohio St. 3d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1999

Regarding Count Two, respondent argues that the board abused its discretion by usurping the judicial function of the court system in interpreting Hecht v. … Oklahoma Bar Assn. v. Busch (Okla.1996), 919 P.2d 1114, 1119-1120 . See Cincinnati Bar Assn. *200 v. Komarek (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 90, 96 , 702 N.E.2d 62 , 67.

Union Central Life Insurance v. Lindley

12 Ohio St. 3d 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1984

In Federal Paper Board Co. v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Akron Bar Assn. v. Fink

131 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2011

Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board did not find any aggravating factors. {¶ 10} We have previously imposed public reprimands in other cases involving similar conduct. See, e.g., Columbus Bar Assn. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shields

25 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

Upon thorough review of the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, the court determines that ample evidence supports the board’s conclusion that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 6- … Brown, Douglas and Wolff, JJ., concur. Wolff, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig

32 Ohio St. 3d 155 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1987

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that Ronald A. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Mac Realty, Inc. v. Commercial Industrial Enterprices, Inc.

10 Ohio St. 2d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1967

There is no question in the instant case that the board took action on the recommendation within the 20-day period. … J., Zimmerman, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, concur. O’Neill, J., dissents.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller

44 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1989

We agree with the findings and recommendations of the board. We are particularly concerned with the fraud perpetrated on the trial court by the probating of the revoked will. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Nunamaker v. United States Steel Corp.

2 Ohio St. 2d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1965

As summarized by Judge Zimmerman in Leach, Admr., v. … Corrigan, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, and McLaughlin, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting, respectively, for Zimmerman and Brown, JJ.

State ex rel. Jones v. Industrial Commission

65 Ohio St. 3d 133 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1992

In Fisher v. Mayfield (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 8 , 30 OBR 16, 505 N.E.2d 975 , and State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Rehor v. Case Western Reserve University

43 Ohio St. 2d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1975

Herbert, Stern, W, Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.' ' ' • • - . - ’ ' ■' O’Neill, C. J., concurs in paragraphs one, two.and three of the syllabus and in the judgment. ■ Celebrezze, j., dissents. … See Perry v. Sindermann, supra [(1972), 408 U. S. 593 ], at 601-602; Zimmerer v . Spencer (5th Cir., 1973), 485 F. 2d 176 , 178; Greene v. Howard University (D. C. Cir., 1969), 412 F. 2d 1128, 1135 ; Downs v.

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Heck

134 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2012

Bar Assn. v. Heck, 134 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-5319.] MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. HECK. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Heck, 134 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-5319.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Eugene N.

In re Hamalian to Take the July 1987 Bar Examination

35 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1988

A three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness recommended (by a two-to-one vote) that the application be granted. The matter was considered by the board as a whole. … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Holmes, J., dissent.

State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust

30 Ohio Law Rep. 61 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1965

at the instance of a party who alleges irregularities in the proceedings of such a board and an *62 ticipates that such a board will deprive him of procedural and substantive rights. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. C.V. Perry & Co. v. Licking County Board of Elections

94 Ohio St. 3d 442 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2002

The R.C. 519.12(H) “brief summary of its contents” requirement refers to the zoning resolution, motion, or application passed or approved by the board of *445 township trustees. State ex rel. O’Beirne v. Geauga Cty. … Hamilton v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 556, 559 , 621 N.E.2d 391 , quoting Shelly & Sands, Inc. v. Franklin Cty.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hackett

129 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2011

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hackett, 129 Ohio St.3d 186, 2011-Ohio-3096.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. H ACKETT. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … Co., L.P.A. v. Purdon (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 69, 71, 541 N.E.2d 448. In Akron Bar Assn. v.

Akron Bar Assn. v. Groner

131 Ohio St. 3d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 2012

Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Akron Bar Assn. v. DeLoach

130 Ohio St. 3d 153 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 2011

[Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. DeLoach, 130 Ohio St.3d 153, 2011-Ohio-4201.] AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. DELOACH. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. DeLoach, 130 Ohio St.3d 153, 2011-Ohio-4201.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Chavers

55 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1990

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board’s findings of *20 misconduct and its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Norman v. Viebranz

19 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1985

Morris, v. … Morris, v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens

63 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1992

Our review of the record supports the board’s findings and its recommendation. … Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.