Opinion

State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust

  • 30 Ohio Law Rep. 61
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 1, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Schneider
On the bench
Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Schneider, Judge.

Sections 2506.01 to 2506.04, inclusive, Revised Code, afford an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from a final order, adjudication or decision of an administrative board, so that the writ of prohibition will not issue at the instance of a party who alleges irregularities in the proceedings of such a board and an *62 ticipates that such a board will deprive him of procedural and substantive rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.