Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig

32 Ohio St. 3d 155
512 N.E.2d 674
1987 Ohio LEXIS 362

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Aug 26, 1987
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that Ronald A. Banig did in fact violate the Disciplinary Rules as set forth above.

We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.