Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

2.74s

  • State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of Education

    69 Ohio St. 3d 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 1994

    Cline v. … Lee v.

    Cited 307 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Ass'n v. Murty

    62 Ohio St. 2d 301 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1980

    . * * * ” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of Education

    105 Ohio St. 3d 476 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2005

    Hamlin v. … Crockett v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Osborne

    62 Ohio St. 3d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1991

    V(8). Moreover, Osborne compounded his offense by claiming that he misunderstood the restraining order. … Brown, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Director of Highways v. Olrich

    5 Ohio St. 2d 70 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1966

    Brown, J. … In re Appropration for Highway Purposes, 167 Ohio St. 463 ; Nichols v. City of Cleveland, 104 Ohio St. 19 ; Board of Education of Cleveland City School Dist. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Twin Valley Local School District Board of Education

    6 Ohio St. 3d 178 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983

    In support of this conclusion, the court relied upon Gates v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in judgment only.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Stotts-Friedman Co. v. Lindley

    69 Ohio St. 2d 348 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1982

    Appellant maintains that the stated defects are hypertechnical in nature and, further, that the board’s holding in this regard does not comport with this court’s decision in Zinc Engravers v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. The record sets forth the contents of several purchase orders which appellant claims comply with the provisions contained in R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lewis v. Court of Common Pleas

    52 Ohio St. 3d 249 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1990

    Tilford, v. Crush (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 174 , 529 N.E. 2d 1245 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Pratt

    127 Ohio St. 3d 293 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2010

    Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Vaughn v. Industrial Commission

    69 Ohio St. 2d 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1982

    Frank, v. Keller (1965), 3 Ohio App. 2d 428, 430 . See, also, Young, Workmen’s Compensation Law in Ohio (2 Ed.), 124, Section 7.1. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. In 1966, R.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Braddock

    21 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1986

    Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact and conclusions of fact of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Robert L. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Taft

    112 Ohio St. 3d 155 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

    See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v. Evans (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 497, 501, 733 N.E.2d 609; Disciplinary Counsel v. Runyan, 108 Ohio St.3d 43, 2006-Ohio-80, 840 N.E.2d 623. The board made determinations concerning all these factors.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Niles v. Bernard

    53 Ohio St. 2d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1978

    Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. … Consistent with Dorrian v. Scioto Conserv. Dist. (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 102 , 271 N. E. 2d 834 , and with the judgment in the instant cause are State, ex rel. Ewing, v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Weaver v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State University

    126 Ohio St. 290 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1933

    Garnes, v. … Cas., No. 18,258; Ward v. Flood, 48 Cal., 36, 56 , 17 Am. Rep., 405 ; Lehew v. Brummell, 103 Mo., 546 , 15 S. W., 765 , 11 L. R. A., 828, 23 Am. St. Rep., 895 ; Martin v. Board of Education, 42 W. Va., 514, 516 , 26 S.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Kraemer

    126 Ohio St. 3d 163 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2010

    V(5)(A)(4). … BROWN, C.J., not participating. __________________ Jonathan Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Joseph M.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert

    130 Ohio St. 3d 402 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 23, 2011

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert, 130 Ohio St.3d 402, 2011-Ohio-5935.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SIEWERT. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert, 130 Ohio St.3d 402, 2011-Ohio-5935.] … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of Education

    72 Ohio St. 3d 94 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1995

    Thus, the complaint states a claim against the board. … Thus, none of the board’s evidence properly supports a motion for summary judgment. State ex rel. Freeman v. Morris (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 107, 109 , 579 N.E.2d 702, 703 .

    Cited 133 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Stanley

    50 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1990

    Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board. However, we find the board’s recommendation inappropriate. … Brown, JJ., dissent without opinion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. McGill

    64 Ohio St. 3d 669 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1992

    We agree that respondents committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. … Accordingly, we reject the recommendation of the board, and order that both respondents be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondents. Judgment accordingly. Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Bryant, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Palmer v. State Board of Barber Examiners

    144 Ohio St. 577 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1945

    county an action, wherein this relatrix is appellant and the respondent is appellee, in which action the prayer of the petition reads as follows: “Wherefore, plaintiff prays that said findings, decision and orders of the Board … Akron Coal Co., v. Board of Directors of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 136 Ohio St., 485 , 26 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.