Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Murty

  • 62 Ohio St. 2d 301
  • 16 Ohio Op. 3d 352
  • 405 N.E.2d 300
  • 1980 Ohio LEXIS 743
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 11, 1980
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.2%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

“One of the fundamental tenets of the professional responsibility of a lawyer is that he should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if the conduct of the individual attorney is above reproach. * * * ” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81 .

Notwithstanding respondent’s contention that violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) amounted to only a minor offense, minus any moral turpitude, the propriety required of respondent by the legal profession, encompassing his overall conduct under these circumstances, was violated.

Therefore, having reviewed the findings of fact and recommendation of the board, as well as the documentation and other evidence presented, it is found that respondent did violate DR 1-102(A)(4).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent receive a public reprimand, and it is so ordered.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.