Case law

State ex rel. Maurer v. Franklin County Board of Elections

33 Ohio St. 3d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1987

See Stern v. Bd. of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 175, 180 , 43 O.O. 2d 286, 289, 237 N.E. 2d 313, 317 . … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Papcke

88 Ohio St. 3d 161 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2000

Bar Assn. v. … V(5)(A)(4).

State ex rel. Walter v. Edgar

13 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1984

Cramer, v. Brown (1983), 7 Ohio St. 3d 5, 6 , citing Pfeifer v. Graves (1913), 88 Ohio St. 473 , paragraph five of the syllabus; Weinland v. Fulton (1918), 99 Ohio St. 10 ; Cincinnati v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Shabazz

1994 Ohio 238 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1994

Tavenner v. Indian Lake Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 88, 578 N.E.2d 464, and State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21, 531 N.E.2d 1297. … 1988 decision in Brown.

In re Termination of Employment of Pratt

40 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1974

C. 119.12 is a general statute providing for appeals from orders of various administrative agencies, and applies to all orders of the board. State, ex rel. Oliver, v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan and P. Brown, JJ., concur in paragraph one of the syllabus and dissent from paragraph two of the syllabus and from the opinion and judgment.

Ryan v. Tracy

6 Ohio St. 3d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

Foreman, v. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents.

FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

125 Ohio St. 3d 485 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 2010

IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. … BROWN, C.J., not participating. __________________ Wayne E. Petkovic, for appellant. Rich & Gillis Law Group, L.L.C., and Mark H.

State Ex Rel. Knowlton v. Noble County Board of Elections

126 Ohio St. 3d 483 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2010

Evans v. … Ernst v.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Amos

62 Ohio St. 2d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), DR 7-102(A)(5 … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. Davis

113 Ohio St. 3d 410 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2007

Weiss v. … Kline v.

Crestview of Ohio, Inc. v. Board of Tax Appeals

25 Ohio St. 2d 93 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1971

On July 25, 1969, the Board of Tax Appeals returned the applications to the appellant, noting that the board’s power to remit taxes was limited to only one year under the provisions of R. C. 5713.081. … The sole issue raised is whether the Board of Tax Appeals had jurisdiction to consider these applications. It did not. R.

State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Board v. Baker

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1959

State ex rel. Whartenby v. County Board of Education

122 Ohio St. (N.S.) 463 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1930

Co. v. Mowatt, 35 Ohio St., 284 , it is well stated at page 287 of the opinion: “Where authority is conferred to perform an act which the public interest demands, may is generally regarded as imperative.” … Co. v.

State ex rel. Tracy v. State Board of Accountancy

129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 66 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1934

That the State Board of Accountancy is a board of the state there can be no doubt. It is expressly made so by Section 1370, General Code, which created such board in 1908. … Respondents maintain this section applies only to boards receiving state aid and that, as the State Board of Accountancy is not within that category, this statute cannot be invoked.

State ex rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Controlling Board

130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1935

If the transfers requested were made, that would be tantamount to the enactment of an appropriation by the Controlling Board. … The Controlling Board, of course, has no such power. The Legislature is powerless to confer on any administrative board authority that would result in thwarting or circumventing the veto power of the Governor.

Cleveland & Mahoning Valley Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1910

Spyker v. Board of Education of Lima School District

73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 376 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1905

Village of Waite Hill v. Board of Tax Appeals

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1961

The question presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals has jurisdiction over such applications filed by the village after it has divested itself of legal title to the property. *474 This question must be answered in the … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Zimmerman, acting C. J., Younger, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Ohio Presbyterian Homes v. Kinney

9 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1984

Villa II v. … Instead, the board correctly concluded in accord with our decisions in Toledo Retirement Living v.

State ex rel. Luckey v. Etheridge

62 Ohio St. 3d 404 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1992

Brennan, v. Vinton Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. . The portion of R.C. 3319.02 construed in Brennan, supra, now appears in R.C. 3319.02(C), with a minor amendment not relevant here.