Opinion

Village of Waite Hill v. Board of Tax Appeals

  • 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 473
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 6, 1961
Status
Published
On the bench
Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Place, Stead, Taet, Third, Weygandt, Younger, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the Board of Tax Appeals has jurisdiction over such applications filed by the village after it has divested itself of legal title to the property.

*474 This question must be answered in the negative. There is nothing in the record to indicate that, after selling the property, the village had any interest therein or was obligated to pay taxes thereon. It may not, therefore, apply for exemption from taxation or remission of taxes.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

Zimmerman, acting C. J., Younger, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., sitting in the place and stead of Weygandt, C. J.

Younger, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.