Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.76s

  • Gouty v. Gouty

    74 Ohio St. 3d 1250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1993

    Gouty seeking the disqualification of Judge Yvette McGee Brown from further proceedings in the above-captioned case. … See State v. Cox (1911), 21 Ohio Dec. 299 , 310.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals

    77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1997

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    85 Ohio St. 3d 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1999

    But R.C. 5717.03 states that for appeals from a county board of revision, “the board of tax appeals shall determine the taxable value of the property whose valuation or assessment by the county board of revision is complained … In Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Milo's Beauty Supply Co. v. State Board of Cosmetology

    49 Ohio St. 2d 245 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1977

    Grosser, v. Boy (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 498 , relying on the definition pf “public record” in R. … Brown, P.' Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.'

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Kosydar

    35 Ohio St. 2d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1973

    (Paragraph two of the syllabus in Board of Edn. of Cleveland Hts. City School Dist. v. Evatt, 136 Ohio St. 283 , approved and followed; Brennan v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Society National Bank v. Wood County Board of Revision

    81 Ohio St. 3d 401 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1998

    While Society’s argument primarily focuses on R.C. 5715.13, we believe that our decision in Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Restaurant & Lunch Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Rutherford v. Barberton Board of Education

    148 Ohio St. 242 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1947

    board to notify relator prior to March 31, 1946, that his contract would not be renewed for the ensuing year if the board desired to terminate the right of relator to a renewal contract. … See McCortle v. Bates, 29 Ohio St., 419, 422 , 23 Am. Rep., 758 . In the instant case the respondent board took such action on April 9, 1946, but failed to do- so within the time required by statute.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Capoccia Builders v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    81 Ohio St. 3d 688 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1998

    Sua sponte, the court finds the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals unreasonable and unlawful and reverses it upon the authority of Elkem Metals Co., L.P. v. Washington Cty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chiow v. Wood County Board of Revision

    144 Ohio St. 3d 126 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2015

    . {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Ginter v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 340 , 2015-Ohio-2571 , 37 N.E.3d 1207 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edbow, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    86 Ohio St. 3d 1207 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1999

    See Edbow, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 656 , 710 N.E.2d 1112 . We hereby award reasonable attorney fees to appellee.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • B. F. Keith Columbus Co. v. Board of Revision

    148 Ohio St. 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1947

    The Board of Tax Appeals allowed a total depreciation and obsolescence factor of 36%. … Wherefore the court, finding the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals unreasonable, remands the case to the Board of Tax Appeals for its further consideration consistent with this opinion. Cause remanded. Weygandt, C.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    146 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2015

    . {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Ass'n v. Hughes

    46 Ohio St. 2d 369 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1976

    We come now to,the recommendation of the board that respondent be suspended from the. practice of law for an indefinite period pursuant.to Gov. R. V(6) (b). … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. See, e. g., Columbus Bar Assn. v. Tuttle (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 183 ; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ishler (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 33 ; Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • National Church Residence v. Licking County Board of Revision

    73 Ohio St. 3d 397 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995

    Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203 , 542 N.E.2d 650, 651 . Furthermore, the BTA has wide discretion in granting weight to evidence and credibility to witnesses. … Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 36 , 647 N.E.2d 162 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Adamson v. Brown Cty. Court of Appeals

    77 Ohio St. 3d 1510 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Begovic (Slip Opinion)

    2019 Ohio 4531 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2019

    V(13)(C)(4). {¶ 29} With respect to aggravating factors, the board found that Begovic had admitted committing multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(4). … V(21).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Columbus City School District Board of Education v. Testa

    130 Ohio St. 3d 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2011

    Bd. of Edn. v. Testa, 130 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio- 5534.] COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. TESTA, TAX COMMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. … Russell v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Board

    82 Ohio St. 3d 273 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1998

    The Public Records Act does not compel the board to create a new document to satisfy Kerner’s demands. State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 455, 455-456 , 584 N.E.2d 664, 665 . … Ohio Adm.Code 3307-1-03 was promulgated by the board to specify “other information the board determines to be confidential” under R.C. 3307.21(B). State ex rel. Lindsay v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Burya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners

    114 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2007

    {¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative, and the judgment of the court of appeals holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellant is reversed on the authority of Elston v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Queen v. Wood County Board of Revision

    144 Ohio St. 3d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2015

    . {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Ginter v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 340 , 2015-Ohio-2571 , 37 N.E.3d 1207 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.