Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
74 Ohio St. 3d 1250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1993
Gouty seeking the disqualification of Judge Yvette McGee Brown from further proceedings in the above-captioned case. … See State v. Cox (1911), 21 Ohio Dec. 299 , 310.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAsbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals
77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1997
Cited 5 timesPublishedFawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
85 Ohio St. 3d 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1999
But R.C. 5717.03 states that for appeals from a county board of revision, “the board of tax appeals shall determine the taxable value of the property whose valuation or assessment by the county board of revision is complained … In Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedState ex rel. Milo's Beauty Supply Co. v. State Board of Cosmetology
49 Ohio St. 2d 245 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1977
Grosser, v. Boy (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 498 , relying on the definition pf “public record” in R. … Brown, P.' Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.'
Cited 8 timesPublishedBuckeye Power, Inc. v. Kosydar
35 Ohio St. 2d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1973
(Paragraph two of the syllabus in Board of Edn. of Cleveland Hts. City School Dist. v. Evatt, 136 Ohio St. 283 , approved and followed; Brennan v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 15 timesPublishedSociety National Bank v. Wood County Board of Revision
81 Ohio St. 3d 401 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1998
While Society’s argument primarily focuses on R.C. 5715.13, we believe that our decision in Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Restaurant & Lunch Co. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Rutherford v. Barberton Board of Education
148 Ohio St. 242 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1947
board to notify relator prior to March 31, 1946, that his contract would not be renewed for the ensuing year if the board desired to terminate the right of relator to a renewal contract. … See McCortle v. Bates, 29 Ohio St., 419, 422 , 23 Am. Rep., 758 . In the instant case the respondent board took such action on April 9, 1946, but failed to do- so within the time required by statute.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCapoccia Builders v. Franklin County Board of Revision
81 Ohio St. 3d 688 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1998
Sua sponte, the court finds the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals unreasonable and unlawful and reverses it upon the authority of Elkem Metals Co., L.P. v. Washington Cty.
Cited 1 timesPublishedChiow v. Wood County Board of Revision
144 Ohio St. 3d 126 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2015
. {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Ginter v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 340 , 2015-Ohio-2571 , 37 N.E.3d 1207 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdbow, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Revision
86 Ohio St. 3d 1207 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1999
See Edbow, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 656 , 710 N.E.2d 1112 . We hereby award reasonable attorney fees to appellee.
Cited 2 timesPublishedB. F. Keith Columbus Co. v. Board of Revision
148 Ohio St. 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1947
The Board of Tax Appeals allowed a total depreciation and obsolescence factor of 36%. … Wherefore the court, finding the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals unreasonable, remands the case to the Board of Tax Appeals for its further consideration consistent with this opinion. Cause remanded. Weygandt, C.
Cited 14 timesPublishedRoss v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
146 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2015
. {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublished46 Ohio St. 2d 369 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1976
We come now to,the recommendation of the board that respondent be suspended from the. practice of law for an indefinite period pursuant.to Gov. R. V(6) (b). … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. See, e. g., Columbus Bar Assn. v. Tuttle (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 183 ; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ishler (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 33 ; Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Church Residence v. Licking County Board of Revision
73 Ohio St. 3d 397 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995
Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203 , 542 N.E.2d 650, 651 . Furthermore, the BTA has wide discretion in granting weight to evidence and credibility to witnesses. … Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 36 , 647 N.E.2d 162 .
Cited 19 timesPublishedState ex rel. Adamson v. Brown Cty. Court of Appeals
77 Ohio St. 3d 1510 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Assn. v. Begovic (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4531 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2019
V(13)(C)(4). {¶ 29} With respect to aggravating factors, the board found that Begovic had admitted committing multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(4). … V(21).
Cited 1 timesPublishedColumbus City School District Board of Education v. Testa
130 Ohio St. 3d 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2011
Bd. of Edn. v. Testa, 130 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio- 5534.] COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. TESTA, TAX COMMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. … Russell v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState ex rel. Kerner v. State Teachers Retirement Board
82 Ohio St. 3d 273 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1998
The Public Records Act does not compel the board to create a new document to satisfy Kerner’s demands. State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 455, 455-456 , 584 N.E.2d 664, 665 . … Ohio Adm.Code 3307-1-03 was promulgated by the board to specify “other information the board determines to be confidential” under R.C. 3307.21(B). State ex rel. Lindsay v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedBurya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners
114 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2007
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative, and the judgment of the court of appeals holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellant is reversed on the authority of Elston v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedQueen v. Wood County Board of Revision
144 Ohio St. 3d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2015
. {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Ginter v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 340 , 2015-Ohio-2571 , 37 N.E.3d 1207 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna