Opinion

Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals

  • 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 15, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.4%

The opinion

Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.