Opinion

Ross v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

  • 146 Ohio St. 3d 12
  • 2015 Ohio 3443
  • 51 N.E.3d 578
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 28, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.4%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 496 , 2015-Ohio-3431 , 39 N.E.3d 1223 , which addressed a property located in close proximity to the property at issue here and which held that a recent arm’s-length sale price of $5,000 was the value of the property. On remand, the BTA shall consider the $5,000 válue of the Schwartz property along with all the other evidence currently in the record to determine the value of the property at issue.

Decision vacated and cause remanded.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Kennedy and French, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.