Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.71s

  • Shaw Realty Co. v. Rent Control Board & Council

    77 N.J. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Long Branch Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

    75 N.J. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Sands v. Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

    46 N.J. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Van Riper v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    137 N.J.L. 714 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

    If that was so an inquiry into the acts of the board itself could be effectively prevented. … In Hudson County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Jones

    4 N.J. Misc. 536 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1926

    State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 131 Atl. Rep. 89 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crescent Bottling Works v. Board of Pharmacy

    121 N.J. Eq. 237 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1937

    Stat. pp. 3943, 3946) and so not within the prohibitory language of section 3 of that act; and prayed that the board of pharmacy, its agents, etc., be restrained “from interfering with the business of complainant in the sale

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

    192 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2007

    R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 25 , 527 A.2d 843 (1987)). … In 1988, we applied the Kane standard in the companion cases of Maynard, v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A.2d 1213 (1988), and Ciecwisz v.

    Cited 277 timesPublished
  • Kriser v. Board of Education of Trenton

    122 N.J.L. 323 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1939

    He appealed to the Commissioner of Education of the state to have the school board directed to pay him his salary at the claimed rate, and the commissioner ordered the school board to pay at the rate of $1,680 for the school … The State Board of Education affirmed that order.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    90 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hakeem v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    85 N.J. 502 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1981

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Gruber

    79 N.J.L. 257 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1910

    These difficulties are sufficiently illustrated by *258 the cases of Brophy v. Perth Amboy, 15 Id. 217; Holzworth v. Newark, 21 Id. 85; McEwen v. Board of Health, 32 Id. 468; Harman v. … State Board of Pharmacy, 38 Id. 117; White v. Neptune City, 27 Id. 222; Board of Health v. Cattell, 44 Id. 516; Bourgeois v. Board of Health of Ocean City, 48 Id. 162. But for the decision in Board of Health v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Powers v. Union City Board of Education

    65 N.J. 575 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 22, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Englewood Teachers' Ass'n

    62 N.J. 262 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 30, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCloskey v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    4 N.J. Misc. 832 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926

    A rule to show cause was allowed by the court, why a writ of certiorari should not be allowed to review a decision by the board of public utility commissioners, dated January 12th, 1926. … Our examination of the record and the briefs, filed in this case, lead us to, the same conclusion as that of the board of public utility commissioners.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bechman v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    2 N.J. Misc. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1924

    This writ brings up for review an order of the board of public utility commissioners, dated December 27th, 1923,’ directing the prosecutors to stop'the operation of auto buses on Springfield avenue, Irvington, between the … This being so, the prosecutors could not lawfully operate their line of jitney buses beyond that terminus without first obtaining authority from the board of public utility commissioners to do so.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claremont Building Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 805 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928

    The judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of Newark refusing to prosecutor a permit to erect an apartment house is sought to be set aside. We are controlled by Bellofatto et al. v. Montclair, 6 N. J. Mis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Hirsch

    6 N.J. Misc. 176 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 8, 1928

    The defendant, Hirseh, was charged by the state board of medical examiners, in the Elizabeth District Court, with the violation of section 10 of the State Medical act (Pamph. … State Board v. Giedroyc, 91 N. J. L. 61; State Board v. Jilson, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 73; State Board v. Maza, 132 Id. 88. The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade v. City of Newark

    98 N.J.L. 555 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Blechschmidt

    106 N.J.L. 602 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Central Railroad

    70 N.J. Eq. 806 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.