Opinion

McCloskey v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

  • 4 N.J. Misc. 832
  • 134 A. 923
  • 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 105
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Oct 7, 1926
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

A rule to show cause was allowed by the court, why a writ of certiorari should not be allowed to review a decision by the board of public utility commissioners, dated January 12th, 1926. Our examination of the record and the briefs, filed in this case, lead us to, the same conclusion as that of the board of public utility commissioners. The primary questions involved are pure questions of fact, one of which is, whether the prosecutor, Harry McCloskey, was operating an auto bus with the consent of the municipal authorities.

The rule to show cause is discharged.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.