Opinion

Meyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

  • 90 N.J.L. 694
  • 103 A. 1053
  • 1917 N.J. LEXIS 405
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Oct 11, 1917
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Minturn, Kaltsck. White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Ghiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 5.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.