Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncmd

1,435 results

1.75s

  • CHAMBERS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 23, 2026

    (quoting Williams v. … See Hixson v. Moran, Henderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Uniden America Corp. v. Ericsson Inc.

    181 F.R.D. 302 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 31, 1998

    In Al-Jundi v. Rockefeller, 91 F.R.D. 590, 594 (W.D.N.Y.1981), the third party was a co-party in the litigation. And, while inquiry has been required when the third party is an employee or former employee, Brown v. … E.g., M.L.C., Inc. v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • SULLIVAN v. WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 11, 2022

    board examinations. … Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Feamster v. Southern Railway Co.

    49 F.R.D. 26 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 1969

    The plaintiff cannot complain of error in instructions to the jury if defendant's motion for a directed verdict ought to have been granted, Weidenfeld v. Pacific Imp. Co., 2 Cir., 43 F.2d 817 ; Wonnacott v. … the defendant, the contents of which are copied in footnote 2; that the defendant traced out the complaint and after finding that plaintiff was the man who frightened the girl, defendant caused its employee Crabtree to board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP v. COOPER

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 31, 2019

    Palmer v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DAVIS v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2020

    See King v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parsons v. Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes

    447 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 1977

    In Wessel v. … See Spielman v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • DUNN v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 6, 2022

    Nov. 30, 2021) (same); Brown v. Alltran Fin., LP, No. 1:21- CV-595, 2022 WL 377001, at *6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2022) (same); Sputz v. … See Brown v. Alltran Fin., LP, No. 1:21-CV-595, 2022 WL 377001, at *6 (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HOSKINSON v. BISIGNANO

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 19, 2025

    In Pearson v. … (citation omitted); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • EWING v. VIGUS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 30, 2025

    Lee v. Cleveland, 372 F.3d 294, 303 (4th Cir. 2004) (citing Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383, 390-91 (4th Cir. 2001)) (emphasis in original). … Brown v. Greeson, No. 1:23CV877, 2024 WL 5146128, at *2 (M.D.N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    926 F. Supp. 2d 648 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 25, 2013

    In Noa v. … Brink v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Red Bull GmbH v. RLED, LLC

    515 F. Supp. 2d 641 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 18, 2007

    Woodke v. Dahm, 70 F.3d 983, 985 (8th Cir.1995). … Brown v. Flowers, 297 F.Supp.2d 846, 850 (M.D.N.C.2003). Unless these factors weigh strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiffs choice of forum should be respected. Id.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Duke University

    538 F. Supp. 1143 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 14, 1982

    In Evans v. … Krueger Co. v. Kirkpatrick, Pettis, Smith, Polian, Inc., 466 F.Supp. 800, 804 (D.Neb.1979); accord, Pride v. Community School Board, 482 F.2d 257 (2d Cir. 1973); Avery v. City of Chicago, 501 F.Supp. at 4 ; Grey v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Cook Group Inc. v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)

    248 B.R. 745 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 23, 2000

    See, e.g., Barr-Mullin, Inc. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • DIAL v. ROBESON COUNTY

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 27, 2023

    Plaintiff is also the vice chair of the Rape Crisis Center Board. … See Gary v. Facebook, Inc., 822 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MCIVER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 28, 2021

    Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res. … Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (N.C. 1990) (quoting Grant v. Emmco Ins. Co., 243 S.E.2d 894, 897 (N.C. 1978)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Capital Associated Industries, Inc. v. Cooper

    129 F. Supp. 3d 281 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 4, 2015

    Brown v. Target, Inc., No. ELH-14-00950, 2015 WL 2452617 , at *8 (D.Md. May 20, 2015) (alteration in original) (quoting, Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Brown, 2015 WL 2452617 , at *9 (quoting Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir.2013)); see also Brockington v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Common Cause v. Rucho

    318 F. Supp. 3d 777 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 2018

    See, e.g., Brown v. … Likewise, in Brown v.

    Overruled by Rucho v. Common Cause, 139 S. Ct. 2484 (2019)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 2025

    P. 15(a); see also Al-Haqq v. Brown, No. C A 8053215-HMH-BHH, 2006 WL 2622533, at *6 (D.S.C. Sept. 8, 2006) (unpublished). Under the rule’s liberal construction, see Adbul-Mumit v. … Serv., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bank of Haw River v. Saxon

    257 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 18, 1966

    Such a hearing is essential for wise and just application of the authority of administrative boards and agencies.” United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 202 , 76 S.Ct. 763, 770 , 100 L.Ed. 1081 (1956). … First National Bank of Smithfield, North Carolina, v. Saxon, Supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.