Case law

Dave` v. The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University Carbondale

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 25, 2022

See Gibson v. City of Chicago, 873 F.Supp.2d 975, 989 (N.D. Ill. 2012). Courts must scrutinize fee petitions carefully for duplicative time. See Jardien v. … O’Sullivan v. City of Chicago, 484 F.Supp.2d 829, 837 (N.D.

Atlas Air, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters

293 F. Supp. 3d 457 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 2018

Rail Corp. v. Ry. … Airlines, Inc. v.

Dave` v. The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University Carbondale

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 9, 2021

Co. v. Wilderness Soc’y, 421 U.S. 240, 247 (1975); Gaffney v. Riverboat Servs. of Indiana, Inc., 451 F.3d 424, 466 (7th Cir. 2006). … See Hall v. Cole, 412 U.S. 1, 4-5 (1973). The prerequisite to a sanction under the Court’s inherent power is a finding of bad faith. See Corley v.

DeJaynes v. GENERAL FINANCE CORP. OF ILL.

442 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 7, 1977

Johnson v. Associates Finance, Inc., 369 F.Supp. 1121,1122 (S.D.Ill.1974). However, rigorous application should not negate reality. … E. g., National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co., 416 U.S. 267, 274 , 94 S.Ct. 1757 , 40 L.Ed.2d 134 (1974).

Gates Rubber Company v. USM Corporation

351 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 27, 1972

Moms Handler Co., 102 Ill.App.2d 218 , 243 N.E.2d 723 (1968); Board of Education v. Joseph J. Duffy Co., 97 Ill.App.2d 158 , 240 N.E.2d 5 (1968); Simoniz Company v. J. … Board of Education v. Perkins & Will Partnership, 119 Ill.App.2d at 200 , 255 N.E.2d 496 and Wilson v. White Motor Corp., 118 Ill.App.2d at 439 , 254 N.E.2d 277 .

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United States

200 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 21, 1961

Carpenter, 31 Cal.App.2d 178 , 87 P.2d 867 , and Kreifels v. … Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sternberger’s Est., 348 U.S. 187 [ 75 S.Ct. 229 , 99 L.Ed. 246 ]. See also Baccrocco [Bacciocco] v. U. S., [D.C.], 175 Fed.Supp. 93. In fact, the case of U. S. v.

Brown

District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 1, 2026

Wilborn v. … Thus, Count 3 shall proceed against John Doe #’s 2-6 and 8. 1 See Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Dave` v. The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University Carbondale

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2020

McMahan v. Deutsche Bank AG, 892 F.3d 926, 931 (7th Cir. 2018)(quoting Webber v. Eye Corp., 721 F.2d 1067, 1069 (7th Cir. 1983)(quoting reference omitted))(emphasis in original). … McMahan, 892 F.3d at 932 (citing Washington v. Walker, 734 F.2d 1237, 1239 (7th Cir. 1984)).

Local No. 644, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Walsh Construction Co.

335 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 3, 1972

Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960); United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 80 S. Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg. … See Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967).

Mitchell v. Hughes

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 21, 2025

Conley, 663 F.3d 899, 903 (7th Cir. 2011); see also Crouch v. Brown, 27 F.4th 1315, 1320 (7th Cir. 2022). … Chambers v. Sood, 956 F.3d 979, 984 (7th Cir. 2020); See also Dole v. Chandler, 438 F.3d 804, 809 (7th Cir. 2006).

Rowling

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Apr 7, 2026

Ave., LLC v. Am. Physicians Assurance Corp., 317 F.R.D. 620, 632 (N.D. Ill. 2016). … (quoting Buonauro v. City of Berwyn, No. 08 C 6687, 2011 WL 3754820, at *8 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 2011))). “Blanket claims of privilege are impermissible in all contexts.” Urban 8 Fox Lake Corp. v.

Zepeda v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 29, 2025

See, e.g., Qian v. … Myers, Blum, and Brown refused to refill them in a timely fashion. These delays could amount to deliberate indifference. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976); Chatham v.

Music Choice v. Claggett

385 F. Supp. 3d 245 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 20, 2019

(the "Board"). … The Board consists of three Copyright Royalty Judges ("CRJs") appointed by the Librarian of Congress. Id. § 801; see also Indep. Producers Grp. v. Library of Cong. , 759 F.3d 100 , 102 (D.C.

United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Premier Contracting of N.Y., Inc.

375 F. Supp. 3d 389 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 21, 2019

Co. v. … See, e.g., Svensson v. Securian Life Ins. Co. , 706 F.Supp.2d 521 , 534 n.18 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("The Court ... properly can take judicial notice of [a] Workers' Compensation Board[ ] decision....").

Lujano

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 17, 2025

Corp. v. … See e.g., Will v.

McPherson v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 186, SPRINGFIELD ILL.

426 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 7, 1976

Monroe v. Board of Com’rs of City of Jackson, Tenn., 505 F.2d 105, 108 (6th Cir. 1974), citing Robinson v. Shelby County Board of Education, 467 F.2d 1187, 1200 (6th Cir. 1972). … Cf., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290 , 90 S.Ct. 608 , 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970); Green v.

Ingram v. Hagen

161 F. Supp. 3d 639 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 19, 2015

Throughout their briefs, both parties analyze their state and federal arguments under federal law and treat the federal analysis as dispositive across the board, so the Court will do the same. … Brown v. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana, LP, 534 F.3d 593, 595 (7th Cir.2008). Because hours-related records are absent here, Mt.

Billips v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 16, 2025

’s (“Brown”) motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. … v.

Shirck v. Thomas

315 F. Supp. 1124 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 28, 1970

Parker v. … Elder v. Board of Education, 60 Ill.App.2d 56 , 208 N.E.2d 423 (1st Dist. 1965).

In re Res. Capital Corp., S'holder Derivative Litig.

286 F. Supp. 3d 619 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 2018

"The corporate board's decision to deny the litigation demand receives the same business judgment rule presumption as any other board decision." Oliveira v. … Actually, only the independence of the full board is relevant, because "the decision to reject demand was made by the full Board." Stoner v. Walsh , 772 F.Supp. 790 , 801 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).