Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

6,132 results

0.76s

  • Glade ex rel. Lundskow v. United States

    831 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 23, 2011

    In passing the FTCA, Congress waived the U.S. government’s sovereign immunity to suit for a broad range of the tortious conduct of its employees. … This claim is clearly barred— “there is no respondeat superior liability under the FTCA for garden-variety intentional torts.” LM v. United States, 344 F.3d 695, 700 (7th Cir.2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Peters

    566 F. Supp. 2d 790 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 27, 2008

    Qualified Immunity Budz argues that if he is entitled to qualified immunity. (Defs.’ Post-Trial Br. at 7.) … Officials will not be entitled to qualified immunity if they knew, or should have known, that their actions would violate the plaintiffs constitutional rights. Id.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Frederickson v. County of Will

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 7, 2018

    In other words, “[a] state official is protected by qualified immunity unless the plaintiff shows: (1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at … by personal animus” is clearly established.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Douglas v. Village of Palatine

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 2020

    Plaintiff argues that the officers are not entitled to qualified immunity because he had a clearly established right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. … For purposes of the qualified-immunity inquiry, a defendant has not violated a clearly established right unless “the contours of the right [were] sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • York v. Sarabia

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 3, 2025

    “[T]he doctrine of qualified immunity ‘shields officers from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … It is the plaintiff’s burden to overcome the invocation of qualified immunity; to do so, he must show that (1) “the official violated a statutory or constitutional right” and (2) “that the right was ‘clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perham v. Ladd

    436 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 28, 1977

    The plaintiff may clearly rely on statistical proof in order to establish a prima facie case of employment discrimination. Hazelwood School District v. … He was clearly beyond the seven-year limitation period.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Huey v. Barloga

    277 F. Supp. 864 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 27, 1967

    The Congressional debates over the bill clearly disclose that Congress was concerned with the inaction of state and local governments and that Congress sought to enact a bill of broad scope to cope, among others, with the … Immunity The defendants also raise the question of their immunity from tort liability under the Civil Rights Act.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Tomei v. Finley

    518 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 1981

    Both the First Amendment freedom of political association and the voting franchise must be viewed as among the most valuable “privileges and immunities” in our democratic system. And the Griffin v. … Brock, 473 F.2d 608, 610 (6th Cir. 1973) might well have been written for this case: We hold that § 1985(3)’s protection reaches clearly defined classes, such as supporters of a political candidate.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hill v. City of Harvey

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 2020

    “The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … This right has been clearly established since 1978. Lewis v. City of Chicago, 914 F.3d 472, 477 (7th Cir. 2019) (‘It has been clear since at least Franks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sprague v. Brook

    149 F.R.D. 575 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 4, 1993

    On February 14, 1991, the OPM published interim regulations that established a conversion schedule for moving incumbent ALJs into newly established compensation levels. 5 C.R.R. § 930.210(j), (k). … Illinois Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 892 F.2d 670 , 674 (7th Cir.1990) (proper to enter order staying discovery pending resolution of qualified immunity claims); Patterson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jumper v. Yellow Corp.

    176 F.R.D. 282 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 24, 1997

    Even if litigation is imminent, there is no work product immunity for documents prepared in the ordinary course of business rather than for litigation purposes. See Binks Mfg. Co. v. … adversarial process, the issue then becomes whether Defendants may apply the work product protection granted to the documents prepared in anticipation of the grievance proceeding to this federal lawsuit — a different, though clearly

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Davit v. Davit

    366 F. Supp. 2d 641 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 22, 2004

    Davit, therefore, cannot rely on Section 1503 to establish an underlying predicate act for his RICO claims. Pettiford, 2004 WL 626151 , at *11; Albarran v. … The Defendant-Judges are clearly and con-cededly members of the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois. {See, e.g., D.E. 1, Ex.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Tate v. City of Chicago

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 16, 2020

    security sweep, so they are entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity is not appropriate for the same reason.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Connelly v. Cook County, an Illinois Municipal Corporation

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 22, 2021

    To defeat the defense of qualified immunity, (1) the plaintiff must set forth facts that, when viewed in her favor, constitute a constitutional violation, and (2) the right was “clearly established” at the time of the alleged … As to the second element of qualified immunity, it has been clearly established for decades that “dismissal of a public employee on the basis of political affiliation violates the employee’s First Amendment rights.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe v. DeKalb Community Unit District 428

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 13, 2024

    Qualified immunity shields state officials from liability “unless a plaintiff pleads facts showing (1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right and (2) that the right was clearly established … , Doe bore the burden of plausibly suggesting that she’d endured a clearly established violation.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McNease v. Laldee

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 18, 2021

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity “protects government officials from damages liability insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … The Court’s next inquiry is whether this was a clearly established constitutional right of which a reasonable officer would have known.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Botello v. Sergeant Lill

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2024

    “The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … At most, Sergeant Lill was mistaken in his beliefs, which, nonetheless, affords him qualified immunity. Fleming v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abbott Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp.

    200 F.R.D. 401 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 12, 2001

    Abbott further points to a Northern District of Illinois case that clearly states the position of Illinois courts on choice of law with regard to privilege. … Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz, 509 F.2d 730, 735 (4th Cir.1974)(holding opinion work product to be absolutely immune from discovery).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Young v. County of Cook

    616 F. Supp. 2d 834 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 2, 2009

    Qualified immunity The Sheriff Defendants filed a second summary judgment motion contending they are entitled to qualified immunity. … “[I]t is well established that the qualified immunity doctrine does not apply to official capacity claims.” Sanville v. McCaughtry, 266 F.3d 724 , 732 (7th Cir.2001) (quotation omitted).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cooley v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chicago

    761 F. Supp. 2d 808 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 25, 2011

    Summary Judgment Standard Every Rule 56 movant bears the burden of establishing 2 the absence of any genuine issue of material fact (Celotex Corp. v. … and (2) that Azcoitia is immune from liability in any event (D.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.