Case law

Fudge

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 10, 2026

The state court need not issue an opinion explaining its rationale for the state court’s decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. Harrington v. … state court has adjudicated a petitioner’s claims on the merits, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief unless the state court’s adjudication of the claim was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly

Steel Supplements, Inc. v. Blitz NV, LLC

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 10, 2023

Clearly, Defendant’s agent knew that Section 1.6 had been changed to properly align with Section 4. He intentionally avoided executing the Agreement until his sponsored version was returned. … In other words, Defendant essentially maintains that it has been retroactively immunized from all of Plaintiff’s breach claims since 2017 when Plaintiff first underpaid. Defendant is mistaken.

Jones v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections (Union County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 19, 2021

The state court need not issue a written opinion explaining its rationale in order for the state court’s decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011). … If the claim was “adjudicated on the merits” in state court, § 2254(d) bars relitigation of the claim unless the state court’s decision (1) “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established

United States v. McLain

701 F. Supp. 1544 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 15, 1988

Defendant submits further that the disparity in the sentences received by the Defendants who went to trial, thereby consuming four months of this Court’s time and causing a backlog on its docket, clearly demonstrates this … Hart, 796 F.2d 976 (7th Cir.1986), the Seventh Circuit found a district court judge’s recusal unwarranted by statute, declared the judge qualified to hear the case and left the question of his reassignment to the case in

Van Zeeland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 10, 2025

2 state court need not issue an opinion explaining its rationale in order for the state court’s decision to qualify … established federal law, did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.

Aecom Technical Services, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 29, 2021

But the Tampa representative persisted, responding that “the project scope clearly indicates that pilot hole borings are required for each drilled shaft location.” (Id.) … It finally argues that a boring at every pier or bent would qualify as a boring “for” every drilled shaft because each shaft would be within twenty feet of one of the sixty borings required by the RFP.

Cuevas-Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 15, 2023

of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. … of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings.

Pennington v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 30, 2024

Thus, an evidentiary hearing will not be conducted. 2 decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. … state court has adjudicated a petitioner’s claims on the merits, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief unless the state court’s adjudication of the claim was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly

Booker v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Nassau County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 21, 2021

The state court need not issue a written opinion explaining its rationale in order for the state court’s decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011). … If the claim was “adjudicated on the merits” in state court, § 2254(d) bars relitigation of the claim unless the state court’s decision (1) “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established

Lamb v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 18, 2019

of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. … of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings.

Delgado v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (St. Johns County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 20, 2022

The state court need not issue an opinion explaining its rationale for the state court’s decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011). … Attorney Shoemaker originally thought it was a good argument, but the more research he did, he thought the case law established that familial or custodial authority could be established

Mansour, M.D. v. Freedom Health, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 25, 2023

Mansour “reluctantly succumbed” to the pressure but inserted various qualifiers in the diagnoses in order to “eliminate or lessen the chance that CMS would risk-adjust based [thereon].” … Mansour clearly made efforts to stop violations of the same variety. He purportedly attempted to correct false diagnoses reflected on 5 Star Forms on no less than twelve occasions.

Isaacs v. Isaacs

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 24, 2023

Despite passing reference to the Due Process Clause of either the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendments, Plaintiff does not explain in even a rudimentary fashion why his allegations qualify as cognizable constitutional claims. … Oct. 19, 2021) (citations and quotation marks omitted) (“[T]he mere reference to federal law is insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction—the implicated federal issue must be substantial.

Caballero v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 9, 2020

Thus, if an ALJ provides a clearly articulated credibility finding supported by substantial evidence, the finding will not be disturbed on appeal. Foote, 67 F.3d at 1562. … To establish the medically determinable impairment of fibromyalgia, a claimant must have a diagnosis from an acceptable medical source that meets all these criteria: A history of widespread pain that has persisted more

Waller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 18, 2023

of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. … of clearly established federal law, and was not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings.

DiPierro v. Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 18, 2024

Of course, “an economic injury qualifies as a concrete injury.” , 942 F.3d 1076, 1084 (11th Cir. 2019). … James’s description of how carefully he otherwise protects his private information cannot immunize his faulty allegations.

Carrafa v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 30, 2024

Thus, an evidentiary hearing will not be conducted. 2 decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. … state court has adjudicated a petitioner’s claims on the merits, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief unless the state court’s adjudication of the claim was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly

Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 20, 2022

The state court need not issue an opinion explaining its rationale in order for the state court’s decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011). … state court has adjudicated a petitioner’s claims on the merits, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief unless the state court’s adjudication of the claim was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly

Klatch II v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida · Nov 15, 2019

Finally, he has not established, or even clearly stated, that he would have decided to proceed to trial if he had been aware of the possibility of a consecutive sentence. See Grant v. … Klatch has not established that counsel failed to satisfy his duty to consult with him.

Foreman v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections (Duval County)

District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 11, 2022

decision to qualify as an adjudication on the merits. See Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011). … Thus, the Court finds that the state court’s adjudication of these claims was not contrary to clearly established federal law, did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and was not