Case law

Craig v. Target Corporation

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 4, 2024

Cornell as Chief Executive Officer, and its Board of Directors (the “Board”) elected him Chairman of the Board. (Doc. 52 at ¶ 7). Following Mr. … In Manuel v.

Slusser v. Orange County Public Schools

936 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 15, 1996

Calloway v. … at 448; Bazemore v.

United States of America v. Darryl J. Madison, Malik F. Eugene, et al.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 1, 2026

At the same time, defendants Malik Eugene, Yvette Madison, and Marlesa Brown are not in default and the government’s claims against them remain pending. … See Gulf Coast Fans, Inc. v. Midwest Elecs. Imps., Inc., 740 F.2d 1499, 1512 (11th Cir. 1984) (citing Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S. 552 (1872)).

Williams v. Eckerd Family Youth Alternative

908 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Nov 27, 1995

Poston v. American President Lines, Ltd., 452 F.Supp. 568, 670 (S.D.Fla.1978), citing Augustus v. Board of Public Instruction, 306 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1962). … In Ali v.

Rucker v. Great Dane Petroleum Contractors, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 14, 2021

Sanchez v. … See Brown v. Ala. Dep’t of Transp., 597 F.3d 1160, 1181-82 (11th Cir. 2010). The first element of Rucker’s prima facie case is at issue here.

Barrco Consumer Products Inc. v. Bajaj

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 7, 2025

“In cases involving trademark disputes ruled upon by the TTAB, however, the courts must give proper deference to the decision reached by the Board.” Freedom Sav. Loan Ass’n v. … Accordingly, and in light of the additional evidence of record in this case and the material facts, the final decision of the Board is affirmed.

Cook v. United States

897 F. Supp. 1403 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 21, 1995

See, Putoma Corp. v. C.I.R., 601 F.2d 734, 749 (5th Cir.1979) (citing C.I.R. v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 285-86 , 80 S.Ct. 1190, 1196-97 , 4 L.Ed.2d *1407 1218 (1960)); see also, Sutphin v. … V. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter a judgment provid *1408 ing that the Plaintiff, Carmen V.

Barlow v. Marion County Hospital District

88 F.R.D. 619 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 10, 1980

Department of Public Health, 349 F.Supp. 1335 (N.D.Ga.1972); Banks v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade Co., 314 F.Supp. 285 (S.D.Fla.1970). In Metcalf v. … Metcalf v. Edleman, supra at 409-10. The Court entertains some doubt whether the proposition for which Metcalf v.

Garcia

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 23, 2026

v. … Nov. 12, 2024); Marcum v. Kijakazi, No. 3:19-cv- 959-JRK, 2021 WL 3190545, at *5 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2021); Dietz v. Saul, No. 3:19-cv-95-J- 34PDB, 2020 WL 13337796, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020); Beard v.

Harper

District Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 1, 2026

v. … Nov. 12, 2024); Marcum v. Kijakazi, No. 3:19-cv- 959-JRK, 2021 WL 3190545, at *5 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2021); Dietz v. Saul, No. 3:19-cv-95-J- 34PDB, 2020 WL 13337796, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020); Beard v.

DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills

718 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 29, 1989

See Brown v. City Of Palmetto, Georgia, 681 F.2d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir.1982). There are no hard and fast rules in determining whether or not a case is frivolous. Sullivan v. … Board of Governors Of State Colleges & Universities, 840 F.2d 1371, 1377-78 (7th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 299 , 102 L.Ed.2d 319 (1988), former opinion reinstated as to one plaintiff, 867 F.2d 972

Kinner

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 20, 2026

Brown v. 2 Johnson, 387 F.3d 1344, 1350 (11th Cir. 2004); Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1193 (11th Cir. 1999). … See McNamara v. GEICO, 30 F.4th 1055, 1061 (11th Cir. 2022). In addition, although decisions of other district courts are not binding, they too may be cited as persuasive authority. See Stone v.

Jerome v. Hertz Corp.

15 F. Supp. 3d 1225 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 9, 2014

. § 1981 (c); Brown v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 939 F.2d 946, 949 (11th Cir.1991). Section 1981 claims can be brought in at-will employment situations. Moghadam v. Morris, 87 F.Supp.2d 1255, 1262 (N.D.Fla.2000). … Harris Young & Associates, Inc. v. Marquette Electronics, Inc., 931 F.2d 816, 826 (11th Cir.1991) (citing United States v. Brown, 548 F.2d 1194 , 1205 n. 19 (5th Cir.1977)).

Ramos v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 4, 2024

See Wilson v. … See Tejada v.

Banks v. Cashcall, Inc.

188 F. Supp. 3d 1296 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 26, 2016

Mar. 4. 2016); Yaroma v. Cashcall, Inc., 130 F.Supp.3d 1055 (E.D.Ky.2015); Brown v. W. Sky Fin., LLC, 84 F.Supp.3d. 467 (M.D.N.C.2015); Chitoff v. CashCall, Inc., No. 0:14-CV-60292, 2014 WL 6603987 (S.D.Fla. … Nov. 17, 2014); Heldt v. *1301 Payday Fin., LLC, 12 F.Supp.3d 1170 (D.S.D. 2014); see also Cashcall, Inc. v.

Rafael Angel Hidalgo Vega v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 25, 2026

v. … Nov. 12, 2024); Marcum v. Kijakazi, No. 3:19-cv- 959-JRK, 2021 WL 3190545, at *5 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2021); Dietz v. Saul, No. 3:19-cv-95-J- 34PDB, 2020 WL 13337796, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2020); Beard v.

De La Cruz Valverde v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 2, 2020

United States v. … United States v.

Brady v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 30, 2025

See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993). In light of the lack of opposition to the Motion, the Court will not find that Defendant’s position was substantially justified. See Andersen v. … v.

Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 30, 2025

See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993). In light of the lack of opposition to the Motion, the Court will not find that Defendant’s position was substantially justified. See Andersen v. … v.

Reyes Labrador v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 30, 2025

See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993). In light of the lack of opposition, the Court will not find that Defendant’s position was substantially justified. See Andersen v. … v.