Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • Kay v. Federal Communications Commission

    867 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 1994

    Brown regarding his FOIA requests. Mr. … Brown requested review of the FCC’s denial of his FOIA request, and sought an index pursuant to Vaughn v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Paylor v. Winter

    600 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2009

    E.E.O.C. v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C.Cir. 1997). See also Marshall County Health Care Auth. v. … See, e.g., Miller v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Adams v. McConnell

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2020

    See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 415 (D.C. … See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jefferson v. Collins

    210 F. Supp. 3d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2016

    Defendant Collins and a non-party named Adam Brown (“Brown”) are B&C Homebuyers’ principals. Pls.’ Facts ¶ 6; Seller Defs.’ Resp. to Pls.’ Facts ¶ 6. … (“Brown Dep.”)) at 38:9–40:13 (testimony that Capital Home was formed by Collins and Brown in 2012 and that it was engaged in the same business as B&C Homebuyers).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Nava

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2023

    See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(A); United States v. Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2021). … See Brown, 538 F. Supp. 3d at 170; cf. also United States v. Bethea, 763 F. Supp. 2d 50, 54 (D.D.C. 2011) (narcotics trafficking generally).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crooker v. Transp. Sec. Admin.

    323 F. Supp. 3d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2018

    See, e.g. , Blitz v. … This Court will follow Darby v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cardwell v. Investor's Analysis, Inc.

    620 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1985

    The Court also notes that defendant's appearance before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board does not constitute "doing business" for purposes of long-arm jurisdiction. See E. & J. Gallo Winery v. … See, e.g., Barr Rubber Products Co. v. Burlington *1398 Mills, Inc., 306 F.2d 268, 269 (D.C.Cir.1962); Hayes v. Livermont, 279 F.2d 818, 818 (D.C.Cir.1960); Chris Laganas Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McKeeman v. Randy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rasmussen v. Gray

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2015

    District & Bankruptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia MICHAEL JON RASMUSSEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case: 1:15—cv—00205 V' ) Assigned To : Unassigned ) Assign. … (establishing Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board), 5-743 (authorizing “District of Columbia Retirement Board . . . to determine and fix the amount of the pension relief allowance”); Rife v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Van Meter v. Barr

    803 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1992

    Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 393 , 102 S.Ct. 1127, 1132 , 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982); Loe v. Heckler, 768 F.2d 409, 418-19 (D.C.Cir.1985). … United States v. Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154, 162 , 104 S.Ct. 568, 573 , 78 L.Ed.2d 379 (1984); American Fed’n of Gov’t Employees v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Philip Morris USA

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2022

    _______________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively, “defendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Ward

    171 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1959

    In Hicks v. Reid, 1952, 90 U.S.App. D. C. 109, 194 F.2d 327 , the Court of Appeals was presented with this precise argument. … “An indeterminate sentence is one for the maximum period imposed by the court, subject to termination by the Parole Board at any time after service of the minimum.” Story v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2019

    Gardels v. … Brown explains in detail why this is so.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jarrell v. Tisch

    656 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 1987

    See Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1, 29 (D.C.Cir.1984) cert. denied Brennan v. Hobson, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1843 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); Butz v. … Neely v. Blumenthal, 458 F.Supp. 945 (D.D.C.1978). Under the holding in Brown v.

    Cited 830 timesPublished
  • Solomon v. Solomon

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2025

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARGYLE BROWN SOLOMON, ) ) Plaintiff, … Richardson v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 83 F.3d 1513, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (relying on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983) and Rooker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nguedi v. Administrative Office of the United States Court

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 2024

    Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015); see also Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024). … Supp. 2d 46, 51 (D.D.C. 2007) (authority exercised over “hir[ing],” “supervis[ion],” and “terminat[ion]”); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McKeeman v. Chaney

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McKeeman v. Chaney

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture

    187 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2016

    Ctr. v. Leavitt, 415 F.3d 24, 29-30 (D.C. Cir. 2005); see also FEC v. … See Spector Motor Serv. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Sorrell v. Paige Industrial Services, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2021

    White v. Vilsack, 888 F. Supp. 2d 93, 98 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … and it chose to settle with him,” Brown Tr. at 43:16–18.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.