Opinion

Solomon v. Solomon

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Rudolph Contreras
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 34.0%

relying on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983) and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)

How later courts described this case

  • relying on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983) and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CARGYLE BROWN SOLOMON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0024 (UNA)

)

JAMES ELLISON SOLOMON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and for the reasons

stated below, the complaint will be dismissed.

It appears that, in July 2012, an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia entered an amended decree of absolute divorce which, according to plaintiff, awarded

plaintiff certain pension benefits from defendant James Ellison Solomon. See Compl. at 4 (page

numbers designated by CM/ECF). In this action, plaintiff challenges the Superior Court’s

December 10, 2024, Order which allegedly declared that plaintiff is not entitled to these benefits.

See id. at 4-5. Plaintiff asks this Court to reverse the December 10, 2024, Order, and instead,

enforce the 2012 decree. Id. at 5. This Court lacks jurisdiction to grant such relief.

As a general rule, applicable here, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the decisions,

enjoin the actions, or interpret the rulings of the Superior Court. Richardson v. District of

Columbia Court of Appeals, 83 F.3d 1513, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (relying on District of

Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983) and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust

Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C.

1

1994), aff’d, No. 94-5079, 1994 WL 474995 (D.C. Cir. July 27, 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S.

1150 (1995).

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: February 18, 2025 /s/

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.