Case law

Dominquez v. Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2014

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 677-78 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson United States District Judge DATE: October 3, 2014

Cox v. District of Columbia

821 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1993

Morgan v. … In Carter v.

Hunt v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2010

Lindahl v. OPM, 470 U.S. 768, 773 (1985). … (quotations omitted); Gray v.

Thomas v. Town of Salisbury

284 F. Supp. 3d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2018

As detailed above, by the time Thomas provided the letter to the Board, he was aware that the Board had decided that his conduct would be investigated by St. Pierre. … Howcroft v. City of Peabody , 51 Mass.App.Ct. 573 , 596, 747 N.E.2d 729 , 747 (2001) (quoting Cady v.

Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union

626 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2009

On November 6, 2007, the Board of Arbitration declined to hear the merits of Ferguson’s grievance because Local 689 filed the request in an untimely manner. Id. ¶ 20 . … (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)).

Di Lella v. UNIVERSITY OF DIST. OF COLUMBIA

570 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2008

Brown v. Nat'l Acad, of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1118 (D.C.2004) (quoting Delaware State Coll. v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 258 , 101 S.Ct. 498 , 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980)). … Board of Curators of Univ. of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 85 , 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) (quoting Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 581 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975)).

Command Consulting Group, LLC v. Neuraliq, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Passenger Corp. v. Veolia Transp. Servs., Inc., 592 F. Supp. 2d 86, 98 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)); Siegel v. Ridgewells, Inc., 511 F. Supp. 2d 188, 195 (D.D.C. 2007).

Select Specialty Hospital - Bloomington, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

Supp. 2d at 104-05 (quoting Thomas Je/ferson Univ. v. … V. The Board Properly Found That the "New Hospital" Exception Was Unavailable In the Gap Year.

Bouknight v. District of Columbia

538 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … See Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C.Cir.2002); Brown v.

Hodge v. Hodge

80 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1948

Evans v. Evans, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 149 F.2d 831 , certiorari denied 326 U.S. 738 , 66 S.Ct. 48 , 90 L.Ed. 440 ; White v. White, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 150 F.2d 157 . … As to the contention that the decision of the Virginia Court is res adjudicata on the question of maintenance, Brown v.

Toledo v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2022

See Barker v. United States, 404 F. Supp. 3d 251, 260 (D.D.C. 2019); Moreno v. Spencer, 310 F. Supp. 3d 83, 86 (D.D.C. 2018). … ' Our Circuit generally reviews decisions of military boards under “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard.” McKinney v. Wormuth, 5 F 4th 42, 45 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (quoting Kreis v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2026

Heinz, 246 F.3d at 713 (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 323 (1962)). … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325.

Mercy General Hospital v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 2022

Servs. v. … Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 34 (1980); see also Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v.

Sheet Metals Workers National Pension Fund v. Metals & Machining Fabricators, Inc.

622 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1985

See, e.g., Fortune, Alsweet and Eldrige, Inc. v. Daniel, 724 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1983); Chaffeurs, Teamsters, etc. v. Jefferson Trucking, 628 F.2d 1023 (7th Cir.1980); cf. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. … In Greyhound Corp. v.

Wilson v. Fullwood

772 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

Parole Board that operated with nearly complete discretion. Austin v. Reilly, 606 F.Supp.2d 4, 8 (D.D.C.2009). … Under both the 1972 and 1981 Regulations, “the Board had no formalized scoring system.... The decision to grant parole remained within the discretion of the Board....” Davis v.

Graphic Sciences, Inc. v. International Mogul Mines Ltd.

397 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1974

to place four nominees on the Board. … member of Graphic’s Board.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2026

& BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. … To say that the Court’s decision might affect future litigation between the Board and the Government is to say that the Board might keep the benefit of a decision that it won.

Washington v. Specialized Loan Servicing

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2024

See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Under Rule 9(b), a party alleging fraud “must state with particularity the circumstances constituting [the] fraud.” FED. R. CIV. P. 9(b). … While the Court must construe a pro se complaint together with all the plaintiff’s filings, see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

Parker v. District of Columbia

588 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1983

See Bennett v. District *521 of Columbia Board of Education, No. 82-0224 (D DC April 22, 1983). … Keith v. Washington, 401 A.2d 468, 471 (D.C.App.1979). See also Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28, 31, n. 4 (D.C.App.1976); Farrell v. Ward, 53 A.2d 46, 50 (D.C.Mun.App.1947); D.C.

Colm v. Kissinger

406 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 1975

Plaintiffs cite for this proposition Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. … See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 182 F.2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 669 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 (1951). 23 . See Board of Regents v.