Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.46s
District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2025
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[W]e can affirm the 4 agency's decision to deny benefits only on the grounds invoked by the agency . . . .”). … Tidwell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcGarity v. Sun-Maid Growers of California
District Court, S.D. California · Oct 1, 2024
. § 371(a), and has delegated this authority to the FDA, see 21 FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 126 (2000). With this 22 authority, the FDA has created a standard of identity for yogurt. … Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 2020
Id. at 1 937 (quoting Brown v. Croak, 312 F.3d 109, 113 (3d Cir. 2002)). … Sapp v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 2020
Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for 1 Southern Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1983). Whether federal jurisdiction exists is governed 2 by the well-pleaded complaint rule. … Garibaldi v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSandoval v. City of National City
District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 2023
, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board . . . .” … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 6 (1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 8, 2022
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 25 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and quotation marks omitted). … Garrison v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRiver Colony Estates General Partnership v. Bayview Financial Trading Group, Inc.
287 F. Supp. 2d 1213 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 22, 2003
Browning-Ferris Industries of California, 7 Cal.4th 926 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 (1994), the California Supreme Court held that a defendant may be equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations when … See, e.g., Pan Pacific Sash & Door Co. v. Greendale Park, Inc., 166 Cal.App.2d 652, 658-59 , 333 P.2d 802 (1958); Gordon v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Nov 3, 2025
Pisciotta v. … Prince v. Pac. Gas & Elec.
Cited 0 timesUnknown44 F. Supp. 3d 996 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 4, 2014
See Grayned v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Cited 7 timesPublished407 F. Supp. 2d 1210 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 13, 2005
Wyatt v. … See Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 511 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1981). Rumbles v. Hill, 182 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Feb 8, 2022
Co. v. … See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · May 6, 2025
Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 6 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012); see also Wilhelm v. … Nordstrom v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 13, 2026
See Foltz v. 13 State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … June 24, 21 2021) (upholding redactions of responding party’s board minutes showing its “litigation 22 costs in an unrelated matter”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Feb 25, 2025
California v. … See Rosati v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownStrojnik v. Kamla Hotels, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 30, 2021
Alshafie v. 17 Lallande, 171 Cal. App. 4th 421, 428 (2009) (quoting Yao v. Superior Court, 104 Cal. App. 18 4th 327, 331 (2002)). … Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownResidential Energy Services Network, Inc. v. Building Science Institute, Ltd. Co.
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2025
See Starr v. … See Bart 6 Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 2, 2020
Merit Board reviewed Plaintiff’s case. Id. The Board 18 ruled in her favor and ordered the Agency to return her benefits “with a lump sum of paid 19 medical leave.” Id. … Ivey v. Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 17 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 18 B.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.
959 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 2, 2013
Co. v. … During the covered period, the Diocese, as a self insurer, was required to pay assessments into New York’s Workers’ Compensation Board. The Diocese sought to recover these assessments from Lloyd’s.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSiegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2019
Vu 22 v. Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc., 602 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1156 (N.D. Cal. 2009); see also 23 Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 805 F.2d 834, 843 (9th Cir. 1986); Byler 24 v. Deluxe Corp., 222 F. … See Traylor Bros. v. San Diego Unified Port Dist., No. 08-CV-1019-L WVG, 9 2012 WL 1019966, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2012) (citing United States v. W.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna