Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.01s

  • Baker v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parkside/El Centro Homeowners Association v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 2023

    “[the 19 Board] may have enough information to file charges.” … White v. County of Sacramento, 31 Cal.3d 676, 680 (1982) (quoting 27 Board of Port Com’rs. v. Williams, 9 Cal.2d 381, 389 (1937)); see Wilde v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Ashworth, Inc. Securities Litigation

    213 F.R.D. 385 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2002

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(3); see Hickman v. … See Reply at 2-2 n. 1 (citing Laxalt v. McClatchy, 116 F.R.D. 438 (D.Nev.1987)); Massachusetts v. First National Supermarkets, 112 F.R.D. 149 (D.Mass. 1986); Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lin v. Suavei, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 1, 2021

    Dole Foods Co., Inc., v. … Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 215 n.44 (1977), see also 15 Cal.Corp. Code 2116; Davis & Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abbott v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Toscano v. Ramos

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

    Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 (9th Cir. 2000); 8 Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). … Bias v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Casey

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 25, 2026

    Compare Castañon-Nava v. … And a district court recently “vacate[d]” the Board of Immigration 12 || Appeals decision that respondents have regularly relied on to mandatorily detain those in 13 |/petitioner’s position, holding that the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilmar Eduardo RAMOS IXCOTOYAC v. John DOE, WARDEN, et al.

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 2026

    Compare 5 || Castanon-Nava v. … And a district court recently “vacate[d]” Yajure 17 || Hurtado—the Board of Immigration Appeals decision that respondents have regularly 18 ||relied on to mandatorily detain those in petitioner’s position.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nayyer

    District Court, S.D. California · Nov 12, 2025

    Respondents “purport to hold [him] under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2),” and because of 21 a Board of Immigration Appeals’ opinion in “Matter of Yajure Hurtado,” this “subject[s]” 22 him “to mandatory detention.” … .”); Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 4 ||2:25-cv-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025) (same); 5 also Rodriguez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Spivey v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 8, 2024

    “General findings are insufficient; rather, the ALJ must identify 18 what testimony is not credible and what evidence undermines the claimant’s complaints.” 19 Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489; 27 see also Lambert v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ward

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 2026

    See Resnick v. … Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 446–47 18 (9th Cir. 2000); Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Browning v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lader v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Noem

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 2026

    Compare Castañon-Nava v. … And a district court recently “vacate[d]” the Board of Immigration 12 || Appeals decision that respondents have regularly relied on to mandatorily detain those in 13 ||petitioner’s position, holding that the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ford v. Sanchez-Galvan

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2024

    See Taylor v. … Oregon Bd. of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 642 28 F.3d 711, 717 (9th Cir. 2011) ([I]ssue is not whether Board’s parole denial was 1 “substantively reasonable,” or whether the Board correctly applied

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mayorkas

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 28, 2026

    When he requested a bond hearing, 22 “the immigration judge denied the bond motion, concluding that the court does not have 23 jurisdiction to consider a bond according to the BIA [Board of Immigration Appeals] case … See Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, 2025 3 || WL 3678485, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025) (class action final judgment), Barco Mercado 4 ||v. Francis, __ F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Casey

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 2026

    Compare Castañon-Nava v. … And a district court recently “vacate[d]” the Board of Immigration 12 || Appeals decision that respondents have regularly relied on to mandatorily detain those in 13 ||Singh’s position, holding that the BIA

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chaudry v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 13, 2022

    United States v. … California State Board of Equalization Publication 30 states that 5 “[y]ou may request a written summary of the facts and evidence used by the appeals 6 board in reaching its decision on your appeal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.