Case law

Europa Auto Imports, Inc. v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local Lodge No. 1448

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 2, 2023

al-Kidd v. … convene an adjustment board.

SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIV. v. Bartel

470 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 15, 2006

Ex. 4 (Sept.1999 BiOp on Brown Field). The Court hesitated to consider this information because it was created after FWS issued the City's ITP. Fund for Animals v. … Marsh v.

Henry v. City of Los Angeles

230 F. 457 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 10, 1916

Ed. 1122 ; Ries et al. v. Barth Manufacturing Co., 136 Fed. 850 , 69 C. C. A. 528 ; Arnold v. Tyden, 193 Fed. 410 , 113 C. C. A. 344 ; Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. … Deering v. Winona Harvester Works, 155 U. S. 286 , 15 Sup. Ct. 118-124, 39 L.

Sibbald v. Johnson

294 F. Supp. 2d 1173 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 1, 2003

Circuit in Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826 (D.C.Cir.1979). … See NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir.1982).

Woods v. United States

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 14, 2025

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992) (quoting 27 Neitzke v. … Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428 (2011)).

Pulte Home Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.

268 F. Supp. 3d 1091 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 14, 2017

.”); Howe v. … Co. v. Pac. Fin. Corp., 54 Cal.2d 773, 778 , 8 Cal.Rptr. 448 , 356 P.2d 192 (1960); Busching v. Superior Court, 12 Cal.3d 44, 53 , 115 Cal.Rptr. 241 , 524 P.2d 369 (1974); see, e.g., Morey v. Brown Mill.

Javo Beverage Co., Inc. v. California Extraction Ventures, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 29, 2020

June 19, 2018) (citing Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465 (9th 15 Cir. 1992)). … Frank Brunckhorst Co., LLC v. Ihm, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6 28152, at *3-4 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2012) (citing Brown Bag Software, supra, 960 F.2d at 7 1470 and U.S. Steel Corp. v.

Glenn ex rel. Glenn v. United States

129 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 1955

See: Ozawa v. United States, 1922, 260 U.S. 178, 194 , 43 S.Ct. 65, 67 , 67 L.Ed. 199 ; Chatwin v. … United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, supra, 310 U.S. at page 543 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 ; Pollard v. Bailey, 1874, 20 Wall. 520, 525-526 , 87 U.S. 520, 525-526 , 22 L.Ed. 376 ; Brown v.

San Miguel Archangel Treasure Tours Inc. v. M/V "AFTERGLOW"

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 17, 2025

performed without significant risk to the vessel. 9 (5) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Nielsen Beaumont Marine, Inc., will not 10 sell the defendant vessel, release it to anyone, nor let anyone board … Nielsen 11 Beaumont may, however, permit access to the vessel as necessary to comply with 12 its custodial duties and periodically accompany prospective buyers of the vessel 13 who wish to board

Tallaksen

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 25, 2026

Stanz v. Brown, No. 22- 12 CV-01164-GPC-JLB, 2026 WL 1822988, at *3 (S.D. Cal. June 23, 2026) (quoting Ingram 13 v. … See Stanz v. Brown, No. 22-CV-01164-GPC-JLB, 2026 WL 28 1822988 (S.D. Cal. June 23, 2026) (finding that 22.9 hours spent on a motion to compel 1 were reasonable); compare Marrocco v.

City of San Diego v. Manchester Pacific Gateway, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 2025

Leite v. … See Emrich v.

Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego

377 F. Supp. 2d 886 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 8, 2005

.”); TC Systems, Inc. v. … In TCG New York, Inc. v.

Martinez

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2026

It appears that the Board of Immigration Appeals 24 (“BIA”) set aside the bond ruling. … See Kourteva v. INS, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 1128 (N.D.

The Estate of Abdul Kamara, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 17, 2026

See Brown, 520 U.S. at 410. … Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 12 (1989); Brown, 520 U.S. at 414.

Acedo v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 2019

See id.; Erickson v. … Plaintiff’s seventh cause of action against the Board of Supervisors of the County 1 of San Diego asks the Court to review the Board’s November 8, 2018 Notice of Returned 2 Claim. FAC at 5.

United States v. Parson

22 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 14, 1938

If the alien be detained at a seacoast port, pending the determination of his right to enter, he might be detained on an isle or on board ship and there served. … So in Maul v.

United States v. Baca

368 F. Supp. 398 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1973

Karnuth v. … Furthermore, citing United States v.

Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. v. Massey

District Court, S.D. California · May 3, 2024

In 3 February of 2020, SIRC’s Board of Directors (“the Board”) issued Massey 5,000,000 4 shares of Class B SIRC stock worth $1,500,000.00 as compensation after Massey told the 5 Board he had not received any compensation … The Board 6 issued Massey another 1,5000,000 shares four months later, again for compensation. Id. 7 at 5.

Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 24, 1953

Board of Railroad Com’rs v. Great Northern Ry., 1930, 281 U.S. 412, 429 , 50 S.Ct. 391, 396 , 74 L.Ed. 936 . … Board of Railroad Com’rs v. Great Northern Ry., supra, 281 U.S. at page 429, 50 S.Ct. at page 396, 74 L.Ed. 936 .

Durkin v. Shields

179 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 18, 1998

In Burroughs v. … In Kaiser Steel Corp. v.