Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

0.43s

  • New v. Yacht Relaxin

    212 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 28, 1962

    [Cf.: Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 348 U.S. 310 , 75 S.Ct. 368 , 99 L.Ed. 337 (1955); Madruga v. Superior Court, 346 U.S. 556 , 74 S.Ct. 298 , 98 L.Ed. 290 (1954); Cooley v. … [Cf., Schroeder v. City of New York, 83 S.Ct. 279 (1962).].

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bowell v. Hill

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 20, 2023

    Duncan, 342 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2003); 13 Cannedy v. Adams, 706 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2011); and Board of Pardons v. … of Pardons v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Project for Open Government v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 12, 2022

    See id. at 467–68 (quoting Board of Regents of 3 Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217, 229 (2000), Rosenberger v. Rector and 4 Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819, 833 (1995), and Rust v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Conway v. San Diego Sheriff's Office

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 3, 2021

    Board of 6 Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 7 Finally, the “[c]ourt[] must consider the complaint in its entirety,” including 8 “documents incorporated into the complaint … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 12 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a 13 tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 14, 2024

    See Seldon v. George Brown Sports 28 Club - Palm, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-01421-DAD-SAB, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1246, at *1 1 (E.D. Cal. … (citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. 3 || Co.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nunez v. City of San Diego

    963 F. Supp. 912 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 18, 1995

    Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452 , 111 S.Ct. 2395 , 115 L.Ed.2d 410 (1991); see also Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 313 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566-2567 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976). … Id., 392 U.S. at 18-19 , 88 S.Ct. at 1878-1879; Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640-2641 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Florida v.

    Reversed by Nunez v. City of San Diego, 114 F.3d 935 (1997)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • CITIZENS LEGAL ENFORCEMENT & RESTORATION v. Connor

    762 F. Supp. 2d 1214 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 11, 2011

    See Cole *1225 man v. … See United Mine Workers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mirabelli

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 15, 2025

    Walters v. … Brown, No. 08-cv-565 BEN (CAB), 2011WL 1130458, *24 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2011) (pre-Briseno); at 8-9, Romberio 24 v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shepard v. San Diego Sheriff Department

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 1, 2020

    Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 5 1982). … Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994). 25 26

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garcia v. Apple Seven Services San Diego, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 2022

    (Retax Mot. 2 (citing Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 18 2001)).) … Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003). Courts have thus applied 19 Marx, reasoning it is irreconcilable with Brown from many years prior. See Garcia, 2021 20 WL 4776352, at *2; T.P. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mourning v. Office of the Attorney General

    District Court, S.D. California · May 14, 2020

    Heck v. … Ramirez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Estate of Irma Espinoza by and through its successors-in-interest Raquel Espinoza, Raquel Espinoza, Adrian Espinoza and Y.E., through her guardian ad litem Juan Espinoza v. County of San Diego, Kelly Martinez and Does 1-10

    District Court, S.D. California · May 7, 2026

    Moss v. U.S. … Patel, 648 F.3d at 974 (quoting Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 6 (1997)). This standard is higher than gross negligence and requires a culpable mental 7 state. Id. at 974.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Houston Casualty Company v. Cibus US LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2021

    Nixon v. Warner 8 Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). … Brown filed in support of Cibus’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 7 (ECF No. 40). (ECF No. 41.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Renteria v. Skelton

    420 B.R. 526 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 17, 2009

    Debtors proposed a plan for confirmation that included payment to priority unsecured creditors, ie., the Internal Revenue Service and the California Franchise Tax Board. … Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust Funds for California v. Robertson (In re Rufener Const., Inc.), 53 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.1995). “Statutory construction [] is a holistic endeavor.” Smith v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Churchill v. Welch

    12 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 30, 1934

    In my opinion, the Board of Tax Appeals in the Estate of Erskine M. Ross v. Commissioner, 29 B. T. … See, also, Provident Trust Company of Philadelphia, Executor, v. Commissioner, 29 B. T. A. 374; Crane v. Commissioner, 30 B. T. A. 29.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gallagher v. San Diego Unified Port District

    14 F. Supp. 3d 1380 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 14, 2014

    Barnett v. U.S. … U.S. v. Luang, 627 F.3d 1306 (9th Cir.2010); see also U.S. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Osher v. JNI CORP.

    256 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 26, 2003

    See Ronconi v. Larkin, 253 F.3d 423, 431 (9th Cir.2001). … Yourish v. Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mota v. Tri-City Healthcare District

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

    See 24 Long v. … not delivered to the Board.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • White v. Countrywide Financial Corp.

    277 F.R.D. 586 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 11, 2011

    Defendants also contend the UCL claims of Plaintiffs Brown and the Leyvases are preempted. … Ghirardo v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Victoria v. City of San Diego

    326 F. Supp. 3d 1003 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 2018

    See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc. , 724 F.3d 1235 , 1247 (9th Cir. 2013). … Comm'rs v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 410, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.