The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 FUSA FRANCHISOR SPV LLC, a Case No.: 23-CV-1559 JLS (BJC)
Delaware limited liability company,
12
ORDER APPROVING
Plaintiff,
13 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
v.
14
(ECF No. 26)
MODA COLLISION REPAIR, LLC dba
15
FIX AUTO VANCOUVER-WALNUT
16 GROVE, a Washington limited liability
company; and ANDREY STEFANCO, an
17
individual,
18
Defendants.
19
20 Presently before the Court is the Stipulation for Dismissal (“Stip.,” ECF No. 26)
21 filed jointly by Plaintiff Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC and Defendant Andrey Stefanco
22 (collectively, the “Parties”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Good cause
23 appearing, the Court APPROVES the Stipulation and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE
24 all claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in this action, with each party to
25 bear its own costs and fees. Further, as requested in the Stipulation, the Court will retain
26 jurisdiction over the Parties to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement for a period
27 not to exceed six months from the date of this Order. See Seldon v. George Brown Sports
28 Club - Palm, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-01421-DAD-SAB, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1246, at *1
1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2019) (“Federal courts may, within their discretion, retain jurisdiction
2 || over settlement agreements reached out of court.” (citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins.
3 || Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994))).
4 As this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of the Court SHALL
5 || CLOSE the file.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 ||Dated: August 13, 2024 jae L. Lo memeaite-
g on. Janis L. Sammartino
9 United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28