Case law

Stricklin v. United States

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 9, 2022

.”); Harrison v. … v.

Karlen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2022

v. … Rouse v.

Bellew v. Gunn

424 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 1976

In Kirby v. … In Stovall v.

A.W.S. v. Johnston

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2023

Brown v. General Serv. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011).

Shalaby

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2026

To the extent Plaintiff wishes to bring this claim against the County, he must “identify 1 Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). … Keates v.

A.W. v. Piedmont Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 30, 2025

On April 23 Defendant’s 17 Governing Board approved the settlement agreement. … (quoting Dacanay v. Mendoza, 573 F.2d 25 1075, 1080 (9th Cir. 1978)).

Greenspan v. Qazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 25, 2021

Ltd. v. Gatto, 49 Cal. App. 4th 1732, 24 1739-40 (1996). … The forfeit of corporate powers occurs only at the 8 time of the notice of forfeiture by the Franchise Tax Board.

Kirton v. Summit Medical Center

982 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 1997

Id. at 393 , 107 S.Ct. at 2430 ; Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 12 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2847-48 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Citing Tellez , the court in Jackson v.

Paschal v. City and County of San Franisco

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2023

Fobbs v. … I too relied on Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167, 173-74 (2005) and 2 the substantial similarities between Title IX and Title VI in my previous consideration of 3 Paschal’s claim.

Hardwick v. US

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

See 7 Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). 8 Here, the Tribe has failed to show irreparable harm threatened by a BIA decision. … Council v.

McArdle v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC

657 F. Supp. 2d 1140 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2009

See Coopwood v. AT & T Mobility LLC, No. CV 08-3683 (C.D.Cal. Aug. 14, 2009); Stiener v. … Online, Inc. v. Super.

In re SVB Financial Group Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 2025

Rubke v. … Berson v.

Hildebrand v. Campbell

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 2025

Brown v. Muniz, 19 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930, 945 20 (2007), and Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 333 (2010)). … Slack v.

Nelson v. Gordon

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 25, 2022

BROWN, Case No. 21-cv-08098-LB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. 14 JOCK … Co. v.

AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2021

Defendant 20 states that it has timely filed three petitions for IPRs with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board 21 (“PTAB”) at the U.S. … Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1032, 1035 4 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (quoting Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed.

CollegeStreet Import & Export (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. v. XL x HF LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 2023

See Kanter v. … See 5 Johnson v.

Lashawna Lashaé Williams v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2026

Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Prods. Inc., 24 946 F.2d 622, 623 (9th Cir. 1991). … Kohn L. 26 Grp., Inc. v. Auto Parts Mfg. Miss., Inc., 787 F.3d 1237, 1240 (9th Cir. 2015).

Barajas v. Carriage Cemetery Services of California, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 2020

Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 913 F. Supp. 2d 881, 15 888 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 758 F. … Brown, 913 F. 18 Supp. 2d at 888. 19 Asetek Danmark A/S v. Coolit Sys., No. 19-cv-00410-EMC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225134, at 20 *10 (N.D. Cal.

Scarlett v. County of Santa Clara

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 2024

Corp. v. … , or has been 21 deemed to have been rejected by the board.”

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 2024

The San Francisco Bay 20 Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Regional Board”) is the state entity charged with issuing the 21 federally-enforceable NPDES permit at issue in this case. See Cal. Wat. … Pursuant to that authority, the Regional Board issued each Defendant an MS4 23 Permit on November 19, 2015.