Case law

Siemers v. Wells Fargo & Co.

243 F.R.D. 369 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2007

Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp., 917 F.2d 1171 , 1175 (9th Cir. 1990). … It is true that many of the funds had similar fee structures and all had the same board and advisors. Yet, what might be an excessive fee for one fund might be fair for another.

Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada Nat. Bank

277 F. 110 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1920

Brown, 7 Wall. 205 , 19 L. Ed. 134 . … Sayers v. Burkhardt, 85 Fed. 246 , 29 C. C. A. 137 .

Vongchan

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2025

formatting in original). 12 Plaintiff attached three documents to the brief.3 The first is a document captioned 13 “Stipulations with Request for Award” from the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board … See Gunn v. Colvin, 581 F.

Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

229 F. Supp. 3d 1075 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 2017

See Brown v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 913 F.Supp.2d 881, 889-90 (N.D. Cal. 2012); Cardenas v. NBTY, Inc., 870 F.Supp.2d 984, 992 (E.D. Cal. 2012); Astiana v. … Daugherty v. Am.

Zayas v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2021

No. 68) (hereinafter, “Initial Motion for Approval”) on 20 the basis that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (“Board of Supervisors”) had not approved 21 the settlement agreement and therefore the motion was premature … Torrisi v. 21 Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks 22 omitted).

Washington Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. United States Department of the Navy

612 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 21, 1984

Ainslie Corp. v. Middendorf, 381 F.Supp. 305, 308 (D.Mass.1974). … Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429 (3d Cir.1979) (“A showing of clear illegality is an appropriate standard to impose on an aggrieved bidder who seeks judicial relief,” id. at 434 ).

Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corp.

593 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2009

Hida, that use of '018 patented invention allows for smaller printed circuit board and chassis in both stand-alone and combination VCRs). … See WMS Gaming, Inc. v.

Livermore Amador Valley Wastewater Management Agency v. Northwest Pipe & Casing Co.

915 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1995

British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978). It is not enough for the non-moving party to point to the mere allegations or denials contained in the pleadings. … See also, Anthony v.

Barrett v. County of Napa

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

Bank v. Fed. Deposit Ins. … See Hubbard v. Cal.

Garcia v. Bradshaw

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024

Renee v. Duncan, 686 18 F.3d 1002, 1012 (9th Cir. 2012). … White v. Lee, 227 F.3d 26 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000).

In re Telescopes Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 13, 2026

Continental Ore Co. v. Union 5 Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690, 699 (1962) (citation omitted). … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 588, 8 106 S. Ct. 1348, 89 L. Ed. 2d 538 (1986).

Kelley v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

642 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2009

Fund v. Fed. Ins. Co., 307 F.3d 944, 955 (9th Cir.2002) (quoting Mitsui Mfrs. Bank v. Superior Court, 212 Cal.App.3d 726, 730 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 793 (1989)). … As an initial matter, plaintiffs appear to be citing to provisions of “Regulation Z,” the regulatory scheme promulgated by Federal Reserve Board pursuant to TILA. 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (a); 12 C.F.R. § 226 .

Wang Zong Xiao v. Reno

837 F. Supp. 1500 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1993

In support of it, defendants cite Heckler v. … Wauchope v. United States Dep’t of State, 985 F.2d 1407, 1418 (9th Cir.1993); see also Ortega v.

Greer v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

855 F. Supp. 2d 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2012

Plaintiff was the “lowest performer across the board in these categories.” As such, Mr. … Stevenson v.

In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · May 26, 2020

USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 574 23 U.S. 318, 325 (2015). Accordingly, the Federal Circuit’s claim constructions are binding on this 24 Court under stare decisis. See Ottah v. … SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp., 828 F.3d 1373, 1376 (Fed.

De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2021

Approval by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors; 7 b. … Camacho v.

Zayas v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2021

See Torrisi 6 v. Tucson Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375-1376 (9th Cir. 1993); Class Plaintiffs v. City of 7 Seattle, 955 F.2d 1268, 1291 (9th Cir. 1992)). … See Staton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 959 (9th Cir. 2003). 11 3.

Local Union 342 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. R E Milano Plumbing Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2024

There is no basis for vacating the joint conference board (JCB) award. See Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2001). … Scott v.

Taylor

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2018

Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 372 12 F.3d 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2004); see also Gaus v. … See Lowerdermilk v. U.S.

The Silverpalm

13 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1935

If the Silver Line had such information, then it was its duty to inform the captain, under the rule of Standard Oil Co. v. … It may be asserted on account of death occurring on the high seas, on board a foreign ship, caused by the negligence of a British ship.