Case law

Willis v. City of Oakland

231 F.R.D. 597 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 2005

The matter had been referred to the Citizen’s Complaint Review Board but had not been heard.” Id. … In Laffey v.

Mirto v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. 20 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 13, 2023

See Spangler v. … Co. v. 21 U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent.

Hoyt Heater Co. v. American Appliance Mfg. Co.

502 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, N.D. California · May 29, 1980

July 18, 1977 was the date Smith lowered its prices across the board. … Assuming without deciding that plaintiff is correct that Murphy Tugboat Co. v.

Bowoto v. Chevron Texaco Corp.

312 F. Supp. 2d 1229 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2004

U.S. v. … Acorn v.

Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. Quintana

654 F. Supp. 2d 1024 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2009

On November 26, 2008, Plaintiff filed an Opposition with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board with regard to Defendants’ application for federal registration of the MyiButton mark. (Id. ¶ 25.) … Volkswagen AG v. Verdier Microbus and Camper, Inc., No. C 09-00231, 2009 WL 928130 , at *2 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 3, 2009); Cytosport, Inc. v.

Spurlock v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2024

Id. at 1168 8 (citing Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1403 (9th Cir. 1990)). … The Court reinforced the importance of rules 23 or mutually explicit understandings to create protected property rights in Board of Regents v.

Dominguez v. Schwarzenegger

270 F.R.D. 477 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2010

Staton v. … .”); see also Adamson v.

In Re Cirrus Logic Securities Litigation

946 F. Supp. 1446 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 1, 1996

Provenz v. … These official publications consist of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") opinions, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statements, and Accounting Research Bulletins ("ARB”).

Drevaleva v. Glazer

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2022

Sosa v. … Sunshine Anthracite, 310 U.S. at 402–03; see also, e.g., Nelson v. Brown, 15 No. 11-CV-2202-GPC (WVG), 2014 WL 1096189, at *7–8 (S.D. Cal.

Jaeger

District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. 24 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). 25 Here, the ALJ found that the first step of the credibility analysis was satisfied. … Smartt v.

Center for Environmental Health v. Wheeler

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2022

Scarborough v. Principi, 541 U.S. 401, 21 413-14 (2004); see also New Life Evangelistic Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 847 F. … Second Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 ||Dated: April 13, 2022 fanadaeB Qenting ichard Seeborg for Saundr#Brown

Matula v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2024

TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, HUMAN TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) 15 RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD … Line Inc. v. Wartsila N.

Zhang v. Twitter Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 2023

Cal. 2019); see also Parziale v. HP, Inc., 2020 WL 5798274, at *3 25 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2020) (same) (collecting cases); Brown v. Google LLC, 2021 WL 949372, at 26 *5 (N.D. Cal. … See 47 U.S.C. § 230(f)(2); Dyroff v. Ultimate Software Grp., 2 Inc., 934 F.3d 1093, 1097 (9th Cir. 2019) (finding the “prototypical” example is an “online 3 messaging board”); see also Yuksel v.

In Re Media Vision Technology Securities Litigation

913 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1996

See Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 379 U.S. 227 , 85 S.Ct. 411 , 13 L.Ed.2d 248 (1964); Thomberry v. … See Northcross v. Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 624, 639 , cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 3000 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1979); Ramos v.

MN Investment Inc. et.al. v. Nguyen

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2023

Nguyen from Amour’s board “with no notice or cause.”10 And no profits were 8 shared with the plaintiffs, even though Mr. … Navellier v.

The Successor Agency to The Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and The City of Emeryville v. Swagelok Company

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2023

Co. v. Brown & Bryant, Inc., 159 F.3d 358, 364 (9th Cir. 1997) (emphasis added) (citations omitted). … Co. v. Brown & Bryant, Inc., 159 F.3d 358, 362-64 (9th Cir. 4 1997); see also Mot. 20 n.10; Oppo. 22 n.14.

Urista v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2022

Jones v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011); Daimler, 571 U.S. at 137-39. 4 The legal formality that makes it a “place of incorporation” rather than a “main office” is 5 irrelevant for personal jurisdiction.

Mirmalek v. Los Angeles Times Communications LLC

District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 2024

King v. Great Am. … For example, in King v.

Chiron Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories

902 F. Supp. 1103 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 1995

On July 2,1990, Examiner Christine Nucker forwarded a PTO Form 850 to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 102,432. … Meyers v. Brooks Shoe Inc., 912 F.2d 1459 (Fed.Cir.1990).