Case law

Bray v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

392 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 1975

The defendant argues further that the across the board 20 cent figure fails to take into account the prices actually received by the plaintiffs and ignores price fluctuations due to differences in time, location, quality, … Federal Trade Commission v.

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Air Products & Chemicals Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2020

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Executive Director of the State Water 8 || Resources Control Board (“State Water Board”), the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality 9 || Control Board, San Francisco … See, e.g., Hathorn v. Lovorn, 457 U.S. 255, 268 n.23 (1982) (Attorney General is not bound by cases to which he was not a party); Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Found.

Rodriguez v. United Airlines, Inc.

812 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1992

See, e.g., Ackerman v. Western Elect. … Lindahl v. Air France, 930 F.2d 1434, 1438 (9th Cir.1991) (citing Steckl v.

Nelson v. Quimby Island Reclamation District Facilities Corp.

491 F. Supp. 1364 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1980

Club v. … Co. v.

Crosscode v. Sharma

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2020

Tonka Tours, Inc. v. … Code § 228(a); Allen v.

LeadIC Design USA LLC v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2025

Ashcroft v. … See, e.g., M.S. v. 18 Brown, 902 F.3d at 1085 (no redressability where plaintiff sought declaration that voters’ rejection 19 of ballot measure granting driving privileges to undocumented immigrants was unconstitutional

Rodrigues v. General Motors LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 30, 2024

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th 6 Cir. 2020) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). … See Oregel v. Am. Isuzu Motors, Inc., 90 Cal. App. 4th 1094, 1101 17 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001).

Berk Street Enterprises, Inc. v. Bravo Personal Care LA LLC, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2026

No. 103 at 14; Pom Wonderful LLC v. … Lerner & Rowe PC v. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, 119 F.4th 711, 718 (9th Cir. 2024) (citations omitted).

Frelimo v. BHP Members

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2021

See Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. 22 Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). … See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v.

Tool v. National Employee Benefit Services, Inc.

957 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1996

Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of North America, 980 F.2d 1261, 1265 (9th Cir.1992) (citing to the effects of Massachusetts Mutual and Franchise Tax Board). … In Moran v.

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration

429 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 1976

See Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 , 96 S.Ct. 2532 , 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Independent Bankers Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 278 , 516 F.2d 1206, 1217 (1975). See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 269 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); Ohio Bell Telephone v.

Kibunguchy v. Shnider

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2020

Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993). … According to the petition, Kibunguchy is in custody pursuant to the ruling of the Solano County Parole Board, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 84(b).

Domino v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 1, 2020

See Brown v. Whole Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146 5 (D.C. … Moon v. Brown, No. 15-cv-01228-HSG, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21 106208, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2015) (citing Allen v. Gold Country Casino, 464 F.3d 1044, 22 1048 (9th Cir. 2006)).

Redisegno.com, S.A. de C.V. v. Barracuda Networks, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2020

Kenworthy v. Brown (1967) 20 || 248 Cal.App.2d 298, 301 (the statute of limitations is determined by the nature of the action in 21 which the conspiracy is alleged); see also Harrell vy. 20th Century Ins. … Baldwin Cty. 13 Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S.147, 151 (1984). Accordingly, the doctrine of equitable tolling 14 || does not apply. 15 D.

Floyd v. Singh

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 676; Leer v. … Gov’t Code § 905, and the plaintiff cannot sue until the claim “has been acted upon by the board, or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board.” Id. § 945.4.

Banks v. San Mateo County District Attorney's Office

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2025

Lopez v. … See Board of Cnty. Comm’rs. of 2 Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 3 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Celano v. Marriott International, Inc.

242 F.R.D. 544 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2007

See Pickern v. … See Hiser v.

In Re Wells Fargo Securities Litigation

991 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1998

See Wilber v. Owens, 2 N.J. 167, 177 , 65 A.2d 843 (1949); Town of Cody v. Buffalo Bill Memorial Assn., 64 Wyo. 468, 493 , 196 P.2d 369 (1948). … See, for example, Board of Education of City of Rockford v.

Lopez v. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center

903 F. Supp. 2d 835 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2012

Executive Software North America, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 24 F.3d 1545 , 1548 (9th Cir.1994); Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. … Plaintiffs rely on Torretti v.

Coxon v. United States District Court

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 2020

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. … See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. 26 Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 284 (1979) (discussing the rare circumstances where courts will imply a 27 private right of action to enforce criminal laws).