Opinion

Frelimo v. BHP Members

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Jan 29, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.7%

The opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 OBA LEE FRELIMO, Case No. 21-cv-00282-YGR (PR)

8 Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER

v.

9

10

JEFF LYNCH, Acting Warden,1

Respondent.

11

12 Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus

13 challenging the most recent decision at his Board of Parole Hearing “Youth Offender hearing on

14 Dec. 15, 2020” where he was “illegally denied release from prison.” Dkt. 1 at 5-6. He has not

15 filed an in forma pauperis application.

16 A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state prisoner in a State that contains two

17 or more federal judicial districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the district of

18 conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The district court where the petition is filed, however, may

19 transfer the petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice. See id. Federal courts in

20 California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the

21 district of conviction. See Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v.

22 Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). But if a habeas petition is directed to the manner

23 in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it involves parole or time credit claims, the district

24 of confinement is the preferable forum. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d

25 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).

26 Petitioner is incarcerated at California State Prison - Sacramento in Represa, California,

27

1 which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84. Because

2 || Petitioner challenges the execution of his sentence, the Court hereby ORDERS that pursuant to 28

3 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interests of justice, this petition be

4 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

5 If Petitioner wishes to further pursue this action, he must complete the in forma pauperis

6 application required by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California and

7 mail it to that district.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated: January 29, 2021

10

11

GE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

12 United States District Judge

©

15

16

&

= 17

Z 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.