Case law

United States v. 500 Pounds, More or Less, of Veal & Beef

319 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 20, 1970

Brougham v. Blanton Mfg. Co., 249 U.S. 495 , 39 S.Ct. 363 , 63 L.Ed. 725 (1919). … Thus it would initially appear, and the government argues, that summary condemnation is an alternative open to the government in any case of adulteration. *968 The argument against such an across the board allowance of summary

The S. S. Samovar

72 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1947

The latter agency in turn immediately’ delivered the vessel to the British Ministry, as bare-boat charterer, with fuel, water, stores and equipment on board. … So liability for a tort committed on board a vessel of foreign registry while in the territorial waters of a country, is determined by the law of that country. Restatement, Conflict of Laws (1934) §§ 378, 379, 404.

In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2023

On January 12, 2022, a motion for 10 preliminary approval of this settlement was filed on the docket for Stobbe v. … White v. TransUnion, 13 LLC, 239 F.R.D. 681, 683 (C.D. Cal. 2006) (citing Manual for Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 14 21.11 (2004)).

Phillips v. Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2025

The Board Defendants include the “Board of Directors of CAES Systems, LLC and/or the Board of Directors of Cobham 1 monitor the Committee. Id. ¶¶ 242-248. … Tibble v.

In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.

123 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 1952

V. Webb & Co. v. … See also Bache v. Hinde, 6 Cir., 1925, 6 F.2d 508, 510, note 3 , certiorari denied J. S. Bache. & Co. v. Hinde, 1925, 269 U.S. 581 ; 46 S.Ct. 106 , 70 L.Ed. 423 ; Brown v.

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Hulsey Contracting Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 23, 2020

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). 19 “Requests for leave to amend should be granted with ‘extreme liberality.’” … Ass'n v. Klamath Med. Serv.

In Re Capital West Investors

180 B.R. 240 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 1995

The Ninth Circuit confronted a similar issue in National Labor Relations Board v. Westphal, 859 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1988). … In Hebert v.

Habelt v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2021

(quoting Hanon v. Dataproducts Corp., 976 F.2d 497, 508 (9th Cir. 1992))). … See 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v).

E.E v. State of California

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2021

However, the School 7 Boards’ amicus brief at page 18 (Dkt. No. 54) states this is a longstanding requirement that predated 8 AB 130. Which is correct? 9 5. … On November 19, the Ninth Circuit issued an en banc decision in D.D. v. Los Angeles 23 Unified School District, __ F.4th __, 2021 WL 5407763 (9th Cir. Nov. 19, 2021) (en banc).

Difusion 11700 v. Comercializadora VNA, S.A. DE C.V.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 14, 2026

Civ. 11 P. 12(b)(5); Murphy Bros. v. … Brockmeyer v. May, 383 F.3d 798, 801 (9th 20 Cir. 2004). A district court has broad discretion to dismiss an action for failure to effect service. 21 Jones v. Automobile Club of Southern California, 26 Fed.

Doe v. City Of Concord

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2022

See Olsen v. … See Zucco Partners, LLC v.

Guerra v. KIND, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2023

See Brown v. 19 Van’s Int’l Foods, Inc (“Van’s I”)., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 1471454, at *6 (N.D. … See Brown v. Van’s Int’l 7 Foods, Inc., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 3590333, at *4 (N.D. Cal.

MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 2023

See Brown v. Bank of Am., 26 N.A., 660 F. … By way of 23 example, Brown relied on Lerman v. Joyce Int’l, Inc., 10 F.3d 106 (3d Cir. 1993).

Garcia v. Quong Fook Tong

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 2022

A (dkt. no. 16-3) – the business was boarded up and closed. 20 Because the only remedy available to Plaintiff under Title III of the ADA is injunctive relief, the 21 permanent closure of Tarta’s Secret would render … Rivera v. Crema Coffee Co. LLC, 438 F. Supp. 3d 1068, 23 1073–74 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12188; Kohler v. Southland Foods, Inc., 459 F. 24 App'x 617, 618 (9th Cir. 2011); Wander v.

Faizi v. Temori

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 2024

See Fitness Anywhere LLC v. … Honda Motor Co., Inc. v.

Mendelsohn v. Capital Underwriters, Inc.

490 F. Supp. 1069 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1979

Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp., 193 F.2d 461 (2d Cir. 1952). In Ernst & Ernst v. … Mattoch, Edmunds & Kemper; Mattoch, Kemper & Brown; and Kemper & Watts. 2 .

Oliner v. Kontrabecki (In Re Central European Industrial Development Co.)

305 B.R. 510 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2004

United States v. … See Gompers v.

Saddozai v. Atchley

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2024

Id., citing Brown v. 2 State of La., 383 U.S. 131, 142 (1966) (recognizing the library as a place of quiet 3 contemplation); Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy, No. 22:1-CV-2176 (TLN) (CKD) PS, 2022 4 WL 95237v 3 (E.D. … Romero v.

Oceana, Inc. v. Ross

359 F. Supp. 3d 821 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2019

Armstrong v. Brown , 857 F.Supp.2d 919 , 948-49 (N.D. Cal. 2012), order enforced (Aug. 28, 2012), order aff'd, appeal dismissed , 732 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2013) (quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Lara v. … ."); Hoffman v.

Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

780 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 1992

Bradley v. School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … But see Nelson v.