Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.24s

  • City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension System v. Wells Fargo & Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2024

    Larson v. … Fund v. Collis, 287 A.3d 1160, 1208–09 (Del.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Peyton v. Smith

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2022

    Over 5 the objection of several members of the Discipline Review Board, the Discipline Review Board 6 ultimately submitted a new recommendation of termination. Id. ¶ 65. 7 B. … Johnson v. Poway Unified Sch. 23 Dist., 658 F.3d 954, 961–62 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Huppert v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Loewen v. McDonnell, III

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 13, 2019

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 23 333, 339 (2011) (citations omitted); Mortensen v. … Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 862 F.3d 981, 985 (9th Cir. 2017) 13 (quoting Brennan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • France v. Eyster

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 2019

    Balistreri v. … See 2 Littles v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2026

    Thornton v. … See 23 Taylor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zell v. Intercapital Income Securities, Inc.

    459 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1978

    Case Co. v. … Blackie v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of San Bruno v. Federal Emergency Management Agency

    181 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2001

    See Gilligan v. Jamco Dev. Corp., 108 F.3d 246 , 249 (9th Cir.1997). … In Graham FEMA granted one 90-day extension, but then terminated the program because it determined that the FSM appeals board was improperly approving claims (they were effectively rubber stamping).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fairchild v. Chesky

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2025

    Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 17 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988); Hoffman v. Bilaski, 363 U.S. 335, 343–44 (1960); Costco Wholesale 18 Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 472 F. Supp. 2d 1183, 1189–90 (S.D. Cal. 2007). … See, e.g., Perez 5 v. Performance Food Grp., Inc., No. 15-cv-02390-HSG, 2017 WL 66874, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 6 2017); Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *2 7 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gomez v. American Building Maintenance

    940 F. Supp. 255 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 23, 1996

    of Nassau County v. … See also Collings v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thomsen v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.

    512 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1981

    Franchise Tax Board, 7 Cal.3d 544, 546 , 102 Cal.Rptr. 782 , 498 P.2d 1030 (1972), the California Supreme Court characterized the Bell system as “a group of affiliated corporations engaged in a unitary communications business … See Gutierrez v. E. & J. Gallo Winery Co., Inc., 604 F.2d 645 (9th Cir. 1979); Contreras v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stanford Health Care v. Trustmark Services Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2023

    Huskinson & Brown, LLP v. Wolf, 84 P.3d 379, 381 (Cal. 2004) (quoting Long v. 6 Rumsey, 84 P.2d 146, 149 (Cal. 1938)). … Wellness, Inc. 9 v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 830, 852 (Ct. App. 2018) (quoting Huskinson & 10 Brown, 84 P.3d at 381).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Emma C. v. Thurmond

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2020

    See Emma C. v. Thurmond, 393 F. Supp. 3d 885 (N.D. Cal. 2019). … If a district has been identified as potentially deficient across the board (or across a good part of the board) it qualifies for “intensive monitoring.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Apple Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.

    915 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 2013

    On December 8, 2011, at Microsoft’s request, the Trademark Trials and Appeals Board issued an order suspending the opposition proceeding pending the outcome of this action. … Morris Co. v. Group W, Inc., 66 F.3d 255, 257-58 (9th Cir.1995). Apple relies on TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 19, 2024

    United States v. Richey, 632 12 F.3d 559, 566 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Upjohn Co. v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Langlois v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    833 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2011

    Rodrigo Munoz, a board certified psychiatrist and neurologist. Langlois Decl. ¶ 20; AR 603. On January 8, 2010, plaintiff went to urgent care at Metro Comprehensive Medical Center after experiencing heart palpitations. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pitt v. General American Life Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2020

    Id. at 5 122 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Williams v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hussain v. Berryhill

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2020

    Brown- 20 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Luther v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 2024

    (quoting United States v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stiener v. Apple Computer, Inc.

    556 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 2008

    ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. County of Sonoma

    634 F. Supp. 773 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1986

    In Hensley v. … Livingston examination 675.00 Samuel Brown 200.00 Drs.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.