Case law

Banks v. San Mateo County District Attorney's Office

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 2025

Lopez v. … Board of 10 Cnty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cnty. v.

Warshaw v. Xoma Corp.

856 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 1994

Mendell was Chairman of Xoma’s Board of Directors. … Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Moore v. City of Costa Mesa, 886 F.2d 260, 262 (9th Cir.1989).

Martin v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 2022

Brown- 12 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488–89 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494; see also Karl M. v. Kijakazi, No. 20-CV- 6 06642-DMR, 2022 WL 875653, at *3–4 (N.D. Cal.

Jack v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

854 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 1994

The report by the National Transportation Safety Board regarding a different incident on a different airline at a different airport is inadmissible. 49 U.S.C.App. § 1441(e); Protectus Alpha Navigation Co. v. … C 93-2981 BAC, Julia Elhauge v. TWA; m. C 93-2982 BAC, Marianne Eva Levine v. TWA; n. C 93-2983 BAC, Deena Anderson v. TWA; o. C 93-2984 BAC, Fulvia Mescola v. TWA; p. C 93-2985 BAC, Aghieszka Gal v. TWA; and q.

Hoover v. Carey

508 F. Supp. 2d 775 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 2007

Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 984 (9th Cir.2005);Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 629-30 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). … Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 570-71 (9th Cir.2005), amended, 430 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.2005).

Gage v. People of the State of California

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2024

v. … Slack v.

Clemco Industries v. Commercial Union Insurance

665 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 1987

by the Board over the carrier in compiling the various coverage plans, and had benefited from the Board’s participation in the drafting of the terms and options of the policies offered to the insured. … See AC and S, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 764 F.2d 968, 973 (3d Cir.1985); Porter v.

Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 17, 2025

Apr. 9, 2015) 13 (affording plaintiff’s choice of forum less weight in class action where plaintiff filed suit in the 14 district where he resided); see also Brown v. … See Ferens v.

Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 2025

Apr. 9, 2015) 15 (affording plaintiff’s choice of forum less weight in class action where plaintiff filed suit in the 16 district where he resided); see also Brown v. … See Ferens v.

California Packing Corp. v. The Empire State

180 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 1960

Kupfermann v. United States, supra; Karabagui v. The Shickshinny, supra. … The quantity and variety of goods that were affected—45% of the canned goods on board including consignments from nine different libelants— make the possibility of inherent vice remote.

Fisher

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 2026

Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 372 F.3d 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2004); see 19 also Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992). … Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 815 (9th Cir. 1995) (presence of United States citizen 8 domiciled in Mexico).

Atmel Corp. v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.

997 F. Supp. 1210 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 1998

In construing a patent, the Court considers three sources, known as intrinsic evidence: the claims, the specification, and the prosecution history. 2 See Unique Concepts, Inc. v. *1215 Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991 … See Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561-62 (Fed.Cir.1991). Means-plus-fimction claims present a special case, however.

Dickerson v. Macmillan

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2024

In Golub v. Gigamon, the plaintiff challenged statements 14 relating to the Board’s belief that a set of updated financial protections were a “better reflection of 15 Gigamon’s financial outlook.” Golub v. … Sys. v.

Griffin v. Sachs Elec. Co.

390 F. Supp. 3d 1070 · District Court, N.D. California · May 28, 2019

Michael Rega, testified on behalf of Sachs that "[e]mployees are paid beginning at the point when they board the buggy." Rega Decl. ¶¶ 1, 4. … Corales v. Bennett , 567 F.3d 554 , 562 (9th Cir. 2009). III.

Gelow v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 21 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Where evidence is susceptible to more than one 22 rational interpretation, the ALJ’s decision must be upheld. … Brown v. Heckler, 713 1 has an independent duty to fully develop the record, especially where the claimant is not 2 represented.” Higbee v. Sullivan, 975 F.2d 558, 561 (9th Cir. 1992).

Sakamoto v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

443 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2006

A “predecisional” document is one “prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision,” Renegotiation Board v. … Brown v. FBI, 658 F.2d 71 , 75 (2d Cir.1981).

McCaugherty v. Siffermann

772 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 1991

Siffermann’s actions were approved of by the Board of Directors of Farmers Savings. … In Langley v.

Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Burnley

705 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 6, 1989

Employees, Council 33 v. … For example, in Shoemaker v.

Navarro-Aispura v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

842 F. Supp. 1225 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1993

Petitioner seeks habeas corpus review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ [“BIA”] order of exclusion. On November 24, 1993, the Court heard respondent’s motion for summary judgment. … I.N.S. v. Elias Zacarias, — U.S.-,-, 112 S.Ct. 812, 815 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723, 726 (9th Cir.1988).

In re La Vern Speer

150 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 5, 1957

Wall v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 108 F.2d 865 . … McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131 , at page 137, 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 ; Lee v. Swope, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 674 ; Woollomes v. Heinze, 9 Cir., 198 F.2d 577 ; and Oddo v. Swope, 9 Cir., 193 F.2d 492 .