Case law

People v. Smith

13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 2004

13 Cal.Rptr.3d 300 (2004) 89 P.3d 732 PEOPLE v. SMITH. No. S123074. Supreme Court of California. May 12, 2004. Petition for review granted. GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Goodell v. Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co.

138 Cal. 308 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1903

(Citing Lewis v. Fox, 122 Cal. 244 ; Savings Bank v. Middlekauff, 113 Cal. 463 ; Harrison v. McCormick, 69 Cal. 616 , and some other eases; also Code Civ. Proc., sec. 442.) … (Lewis v. Fox, 122 Cal. 244 .) In Harrison v.

Welsbach Co. v. State of California

206 Cal. 556 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1929

Co. v. Jordan, 200 Cal. 667 [ 254 Pac. 551 ]. … Co. v.

Intel Corporation v. Hamidi

118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 546 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2002

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 546 (2002) 43 P.3d 587 INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kourosh Kenneth HAMIDI, Defendant and Appellant. No. S103781. Supreme Court of California. March 27, 2002. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, J., WERDEGAR, J., BROWN, J., and MORENO, J., concur.

Hunter v. Justice's Court

36 Cal. 2d 315 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1950

City of Oxford, supra; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Tex. 296 [ 83 S.W.2d 935 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 ] ; Berline v. … (Ex parte Whitley, 144 Cal. 167, 171 [ 77 P. 879 , 1 Ann.Cas. 13]; Bohannon v. Board of Medical Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 215 [ 140 P. 1089 ]; People v. Walsh, 346 Ill. 52 [ 178 N.E. 343 ]; Gerard v. Smith (Tex.

Townsend v. State Bar

4 Cal. 2d 619 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1935

(Townsend v. State Bar, 210 Cal. 362 [ 291 Pac. 837 ].) The suspension terminated September 30, 1931. In 1932 the petitioner was a candidate for election to the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles. … The board thereupon recommended to this court that petitioner be suspended from the practice for six months.

Tully v. Bauer

52 Cal. 487 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

in support of the point that the publication was sufficient, cited Haskell v. Bartlett, 34 Cal. 284 ; Chandler v. Spear, 22 Vt. 388 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 11 Vt. 569 ; Clark v. Mowyer, 5 Mich. 465 ; People v. … Seymour, 16 Cal. 332 ; Perry v. Washburn, 12 Cal. 270 .) H H. Haight, for the Respondents.

People v. Black

120 Cal. 553 · California Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1898

Whether the cost of the printing shall be paid by the clerk in the first instance, or whether the person doing the work shall present his claim therefor to the board of supervisors, is immaterial. … (See San Francisco v. Broderick, 111 Cal. 302 .) ' The order asked for is granted.

Barreiro v. State Bar

2 Cal. 3d 912 · California Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1970

The disciplinary board, however, ordered the matter transferred to it for a hearing. … (Medoff v. State Bar (1969) 71 Cal.2d 535, 546 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 696 , 455 P.2d 800 ].) The situation presented here is most unusual.

Dawson v. County of Los Angeles

15 Cal. 2d 77 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1940

In the case of Weber v. Santa Barbara County, L. A. … There can be no question that the requirement of preliminary objection to the board of equalization applies equally to an alleged excessive assessment of personal property. (Southern Cal. Hardwood Co. v. County of L.

Lewis v. State Bar

28 Cal. 3d 683 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1981

Opinion THE COURT This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (disciplinary board) that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of thirty days, but that … (See, e.g., Call v. State Bar (1955) 45 Cal.2d 104, 110-111 [ 287 P.2d 761 ]; Friday v. State Bar (1943) 23 Cal.2d 501, 505-508 [ 144 P.2d 564 ].)

Di Gaeta v. State Bar

59 Cal. 2d 116 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1963

The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors to show that its findings are not supported by the evidence or that its recommendation is erroneous or unlawful. (Rock v. … The penalty recommended by the Board of Governors—six months' suspension, with three months’ “actual” and probationary conditions, including restitution to the Perezes of $1,750—is not excessive. (Krieger v.

Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal

17 Cal. 2d 280 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1941

Ed. 408 ] [shipping board]; De Pauw University v. Brunk, 53 Fed. (2d) 647, 652; Palermo L. & W. Co. v. Railroad Com., 227 Fed. 708 ; Hammerstrom v. Toy Nat. Bank, 81 Fed. (2d) 628 [tax board]; American Bond etc. Co. v. … Co. v. Railroad Com., supra; Carlson v. Railroad Com., 216 Cal. 653, 655 [ 15 Pac. (2d) 859 ]; Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Com., supra; McCardle v. Board of Commissioners, 195 Ind. 281 [ 144 N.

Bock v. Hamilton Square Baptist Church

219 Cal. 284 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1933

This railing was about 3i feet high and consisted of perpendicular boards surmounted by a grooved railing, the top of the boards fitting into the groove in the railing. … He also found there the garbage can and its contents, together with portions of the boards and railing. The railings and boards were introduced as exhibits in the trial court.

Crowell v. Sonoma County

25 Cal. 313 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

It was held in Sherbourne v. … In Hoffman v.

Garrett v. Superior Court

11 Cal. 3d 245 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1974

Dist. v. Jos. W. … Dist. v.

People v. Hofsheier

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2004

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 211 (2004) 91 P.3d 163 PEOPLE v. HOFSHEIER. No. S124636. Supreme Court of California. June 9, 2004. Petition for review granted. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Helm

143 Cal. 553 · California Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1904

(Desmond v. Dunn, 55 Cal. 242, 246 ; Staude v. Election Commissioners, 61 Cal. 313, 320 ; Ex parte Armstrong, 84 Cal. 655 .) … (Staude v. Election Commissioners, 61 Cal. 313 ; Thomason v. Ashworth, 73 Cal. 73 ; People v. Henshaw, 76 Cal. 436 .)

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 470 · California Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2000

(E.g., Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown (1957) 354 U.S. 436, 441 [ 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1327-1328 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 ]; Near v. Minnesota, supra, 283 U.S. at p. 716 [ 51 S.Ct. at p. 631 ].) … Kennard, J., Werdegar, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN

28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2005

28 Cal.Rptr.3d 2 (2005) 110 P.3d 1217 BRANICK v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN. No. S132433. Supreme Court of California. April 27, 2005. Petition for review granted; issues limited Petition for review GRANTED. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.