Opinion

Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN

  • 28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2
  • 110 P.3d 1217
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 27, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
George
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.4%

granting petition for review

How later courts described this case

  • granting petition for review

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

28 Cal.Rptr.3d 2 (2005)

110 P.3d 1217

BRANICK

v.

DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN.

No. S132433.

Supreme Court of California.

April 27, 2005.

Petition for review granted; issues limited

Petition for review GRANTED.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.