Opinion

Tully v. Bauer

  • 52 Cal. 487
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1877
Status
Published
Author
Coubt
On the bench
Coubt
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 85.6%

The opinion

in support of the point that the publication was sufficient, cited Haskell v. Bartlett, 34 Cal. 284 ; Chandler v. Spear, 22 Vt. 388 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 11 Vt. 569 ; Clark v. Mowyer, 5 Mich. 465 ; People v. Seymour, 16 Cal. 332 ; Perry v. Washburn, 12 Cal. 270 .)

H H. Haight, for the Respondents.

By the Coubt :

The fifteenth section of the Revenue Act of 1857, as amended in 1859, (Stats. 1859, p. 348) provides that the delinquent tax list shall be published by one insertion, once a week, for three successive weeks, in a newspaper published in the city and county, or in a supplement to such paper; and it is required that the time and place of commencing the sale of the delinquent property shall be designated in such publication. There *489 is no other mode in which the time of the sale can be designated, or the notice thereof given, than by such publication.

In this case the delinquent list was published in a supplement to the newspaper; and it was proven that the supplement was not circulated co-extensively with the newspaper, but was delivered to subscribers and others within the city and county, and not to those without the city and county. It was not the intent of the statute that the list might be published in a single copy, or a limited number of copies, of a supplement to the newspaper ; but that it might be published in a supplement which was distributed for circulation generally with the newspaper. The publication in this case does not conform to the statute, and therefore is insufficient as a notice of the time of sale.

It is urged that the defendant cannot avail himself of this objection as a defense; but in our opinion the point is not tenable. The twenty-third section provides that the party resisting the Tax Collector’s deed may show, among other things : “ Fourth, that at a proper time and place the property was not sold,” etc. The proper time for the sale is the time stated in the publication of the delinquent list made in conformity with the statute. The time cannot be fixed in any other mode.

Judgment and order affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.