Case law

(PC) Wilkins v. Joksch

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 23, 2024

See F.T.C. v. AMG Servs., Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00536-GMN, 2014 28 WL 2742872, at *2 (D. Nev. June 17, 2014). … See Barlow v. Ground, F.3d 231, 232-234 9 | (9th Cir. 1994).

Kaspar

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 25, 2025

In Cohn v. … Id. 12 V.

Williams v. County of Fresno

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 11, 2019

Basque v. Cty. 17 of Placer, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117290 at *2 (E.D. Cal. July 26, 2017). … Brown v. Alexander, 13-cv-01451, 2015 WL 7350183 at *2 (N.D. 21 Cal.

(PC) Hill v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 25, 2024

Scotland, the Associate Warden; and Sergeant Bater for keeping him in a cell that 21 leaked a thick, brown substance from the ceiling. … King v.

Juan J. Vargas v. Kern Valley State Prison, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 17, 2026

Sanchez v. … California, 191 F.3d 1020, 1025–26 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[t]he State of California has 15 not waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity with respect to claims brought under § 1983 in 16 federal court”); Brown v.

Morales

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 31, 2025

Petitioner challenges the March 26, 2025 decision of the 19 California Board of Parole Hearings to deny him parole. Consequently, the instant petition is one 20 for review of the execution of a sentence. … Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).

(PC) Hammler v. Diaz

District Court, E.D. California · Nov 18, 2024

Brown v. Gilmore, 533 U.S. 11 1301, 1303 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, as defendants point out, there is no 12 allegation that plaintiff is being denied access to court. … Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 20 | v.

Mullin

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 2, 2026

Ward v. Chavez, 678 1 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir. 2012). Because exhaustion is not required by statute, it is not 2 jurisdictional. Brown v. … Puga v.

(PC) Hodge v. Taylor

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 6, 2023

Adele v. Dunn, 2012 WL 5944705, at 12 *2 (D. Nev. Nov. 26, 2012) (citing Schlagenhauf v. … Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. 20 Robins Co., 697 F.2d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 1983); see also Dadon v.

(PC) Sosa v. Foulk

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 10, 2020

See 9 Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 223 (2005); Brown v. … Defendants Brown and Weeks 6 a.

(DP) Contreras v. Davis

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 18, 2020

People v. … See Cowan v. Davis, No. 1:19-CV-00745-DAD, 2020 WL 4698968, at 15 *3 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2020); Brown v. Davis, No. 1:19-CV-01796, 2020 WL 5069654, at * 5 16 (E.D. Cal. August 27, 2020).

(PC) Buchholz v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California · Dec 27, 2024

See 28 Groten v. California, 251 F.3d 844, 851 (9th Cir. 2001) (“[T]he State is not a ‘person’ for 1 || purposes of § 1983.”); Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356, 365 (1990) (“Will[ v. Mich. … .”); Brown v. California Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th 5 || Cir. 2009) (a § 1983 suit against CDCR is barred by the Eleventh Amendment).

James Curtis Kern v. San Joaquin General Hospital, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Jul 20, 2026

Comm’rs of Bryan 16 Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 (1997). 17 IV. … Martinez v.

Alberto Fernando Manfredi, et al. v. Lakeland Village Owners Association, et al.

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 24, 2025

liable as each Defendant served as a board member 22 for Defendant Lakeland Village’s Board of Directors during the relevant time period. 23 Compl. ¶¶ 40-43. … See 20 Destfino v.

(PC) Gallegos v. Sahota

District Court, E.D. California · Oct 16, 2024

Brown’ respond/assign it within a day/10 as mandated for such a 28 SMFF complaint.” (Id.) … Johnson v.

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California · Feb 28, 2023

See, e.g., Coleman v. Brown, 938 F. Supp. 2d 955, 973-79 (E.D. … See April 19, 2017 Order, ECF No. 5610, at 8- 11 11, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, Coleman v. Brown, No. 17-16080 (9th Cir.

(PC) Singleton v. Cuevas

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 24, 2022

The conduct of 18 the named defendants’ that is described in the complaint cannot be considered the proximate 19 cause of the Parole Board’s decision. See Mendez v. … You cannot base a claim against these CMF defendants on what the Parole Board 21 did, even though you think the Parole Board based its decision on the retaliatory RVRs.

Frye v. The Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards

District Court, E.D. California · Aug 1, 2025

Each state licensing board mandates that a 17 licensing candidate take the EPPP exam. (Id.) … His complaint only alleged federal funding as to state licensing boards, 2 (see SAC at 7), which are not defendants in this case.

(PS) Memmott v. Manning

District Court, E.D. California · Sep 24, 2024

See Costlow v. … See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, 6 || S.A. v.

Bishop v. Petro-Chemical Transport, LLC

582 F. Supp. 2d 1290 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 17, 2008

See Hipp v. Liberty National Life Ins. Co., 252 F.3d 1208, 1219 (11th Cir.2001) (two tiered approach is an effective tool). Accord Brown v. … Randy Brown ¶ 2.) Petro-Chemical further presents evidence that it actively pursues and obtains interstate transportation of petroleum products.