Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscaed

9,021 results

5.73s

  • (PC) Robles v. Cueva

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 6, 2025

    See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 12 397, 403 (1997). Thus, municipal liability must rest on the actions of the municipality, and not of 13 the actions of its employees or officers. See id. … See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th 10 Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Cantine Rallo, S.P.A.

    430 F. Supp. 2d 1064 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 17, 2005

    On July 16, 2004, Ral-lo moved the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) for relief from this ruling. … notices in a proceeding before, and of actions of, the [Surface Transportation] Board may be made.”); 49 U.S.C. § 724 (a) (“A carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the [Surface Transportation] Board

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • (PC) Campbell v. Dickey

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 24, 2019

    P. 33(b)(4); Davis v. … See Brown v. Williams, No. 1:09-cv-00792-LJO-GBC 17 (PC), 2012 WL 1290801, at *1 (E.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Landis v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 2024

    Doe I v. … Dittman, 191 F.3d at 23 1025–26 (citing Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 (1985)); see also Brown v. 24 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Su

    289 F. Supp. 3d 1130 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 10, 2017

    Co. v. Cal. ex rel. Cal. … See CSX Transp., Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • (PC) Holguin v. Bell

    District Court, E.D. California · Dec 10, 2021

    In support, he cites Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 936-937 (9th 14 Cir. 2005). … Brown, 422 26 F.3d at 934.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Galaz v. Pfeiffer

    District Court, E.D. California · Apr 19, 2024

    Petitioner seeks review of an adverse Board of 20 Parole Hearing decision in 2021. … ’s decision. 14 Miller, 642 F.3d at 716; Swarthout v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Green v. Kibler

    District Court, E.D. California · May 4, 2022

    Id. at 222; see also Miller v. … Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC)Marsala v. Diaz

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 17, 2023

    Adult Inst.); (2) 17 Patrick Eaton, Warden; (3) Katie Brown, Chief Medical Officer; (4) E. … CME Katie Brown announced a medical need to “not make 28 moves on Fac. B dorm living.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Cato v. Darst

    District Court, E.D. California · May 28, 2020

    This is especially the case given that an investigation — the 17 form of relief requested by Plaintiff — had already been performed. 18 The Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s application of Brown v. … See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 744 (9th Cir. 2002). 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Blackwell v. Covello

    District Court, E.D. California · Mar 10, 2021

    See 12 Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). 13 II. … See, e.g., Brown v. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Saenz v. Brinton

    District Court, E.D. California · Aug 26, 2024

    (ECF No. 31.) 7 “Under California law, the parole board must consider “[a]ll relevant, reliable 8 information” in determining suitability for parole.” Nettles v. … The parole board 12 may deny parole “on the basis of any of the grounds presently available to it.” Id. (quoting 13 Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir. 2003)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Merino v. Gomez

    District Court, E.D. California · May 16, 2024

    Powertech Tech. v. Tessera, No. 4:11-cv- 22 06121-CW, 2014 WL 2538973, at *5 (N.D. Cal. … Powertech Tech., 2014 WL 2538973 at *5; see also Josifovich v. Secure 27 Computing Corp., No. 07-5469, 2009 WL 2390611, at *6 (D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Bailey v. St. Andre

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 27, 2024

    In Nettles v. … Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 7 | v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (DP) San Nicolas v. Ayers

    District Court, E.D. California · May 15, 2024

    Later that same year, Petitioner filed a “protective” federal 3 habeas corpus petition pursuant to Pace v. … Board. 18 ACCORDINGLY, 19 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Riggs

    District Court, E.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

    Co. v. … These provisions supply a default rule that a county acts 3 through its board and that all “powers,” including final policymaking authority, rest with the 4 board absent an ordinance, resolution, or sustained board ratification

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) Abdullah v. Dacuycuy

    District Court, E.D. California · Jun 28, 2023

    Morales v. … Barris v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (HC) Rouser v. Lozano

    District Court, E.D. California · May 7, 2021

    See 4 Swarthout v. … Inst. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • (PC) McMillan v. Delgado

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 16, 2020

    Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 816 26 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Gilder v. PGA Tour, Inc., 936 F.2d 417, 421 (9th Cir. 1991)). … Brown, C. Riley, B. Jones, M.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of Interior

    637 F. Supp. 2d 777 · District Court, E.D. California · Sep 19, 2008

    Central Delta Water Agency v. United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir.2002) (quoting Ecological Rights Found. v. Pac. … As to the second requirement, Lujan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.