Case law

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

682 F.3d 72 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2012

Rather, as explained in Anderson v. … Likewise, in Timmons v.

International Union of Electrical v. National Labor Relations Board

650 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 28, 1980

The order of the National Labor Relations Board is supported by substantial evidence in the record taken as a whole. See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Moreover, this court finds that the Board’s order is otherwise free from reversible legal error.

United States Postal Service v. National Labor Relations Board

969 F.2d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1992

RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: In NLRB v. J. … We have no warrant on the facts before us to declare the Board’s relief order excessive. See Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v.

Willmar Electric Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

968 F.2d 1327 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1992

Accordingly the Board found that Willmar had committed an unfair labor practice. … Zachry v. NLRB, 886 F.2d at 74-75.

Wayne Turner v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics

354 F.3d 890 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2004

There is no basis to conclude that the Board was not “the party legally responsible for relief on the merits,” Kentucky v. … Turner incurred and continued to incur attorney’s fees and expenses because the Board refused to certify the election results. See Nationwide Bldg. Maintenance, Inc. v.

Commuter Rail Division of Regional Transportation Authority v. Surface Transportation Board

608 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2010

Cir. 2005) (quoting United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 (1996)) (internal quotation omitted). … Jackson County, N.C. v. FERC, 589 F.3d 1284, 1288 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992)) (internal quotation omitted).

Loan Syndications & Trading Ass'n v. Securities & Exchange Commission

818 F.3d 716 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 2016

Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion filed for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: In the law, as in life, the simplest explanation is sometimes the best one. Cf. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Zelener, 373 F.3d 861, 868 (7th Cir. 2004) (Easterbrook, J.)

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. The Civil Aeronautics Board

683 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1982

The Standard of Review At the outset we note that the scope of review of the Board order at issue in this case is narrow. Cohen v. CAB, 657 F.2d 999, 1002 (8th Cir. 1981). … a merger . . .. ” Air Line Employees Association v.

Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee v. National Labor Relations Board

603 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1978

An agency in its deliberations is under an obligation to follow, distinguish, or overrule its own precedent, Brown v. … Webb, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 233 at 242 , 580 F.2d 496 at 505, n. 25 (1978); NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968); see also Brown v. NLRB, supra; NLRB v.

Plasterers Local Union No. 79 v. National Labor Relations Board

461 F.2d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1972

P 12,487 PLASTERERS LOCAL UNION NO. 79, OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. … The Board's cross-application to enforce its order is granted. 4 So ordered. 1 Plasterers Local Union No. 79 v. N.L. R.B., 142 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 440 F.2d 174 (1970), Judge MacKinnon dissenting 2 NLRB v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

314 F. Supp. 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1969

See also Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Johnston, 295 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1961); American Air Export & Import Co. v. O’Neill, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 221 F.2d 829 (1954); Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. … Reynolds v.

Drug Plastics & Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

38 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1994

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1970

B. v. … Stevens remedy,” which would require the publication of the Board’s mandates through oral explanation of the Board’s ruling on this case to assembled employees on Company time. J. P. Stevens (I) v. N. L. R.

Singletary v. District of Columbia

766 F.3d 66 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997)) (alterations omitted). On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court granted partial summary judgment to Singletary on the question of liability. … Id.; see Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Warren v. District of Columbia,  10 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Brown & Bigelow, Paul W. Felt v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

232 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1955

Black-Clawson Co. v. Centrifugal Engineering & P. Corp., 6 Cir., 1936, 83 F.2d 116 , certiorari denied, 1936, 299 U.S. 554 , 57 S.Ct. 16 , 81 L.Ed. 408 . … Kistler v. Coe, 1944, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 36 , 142 F.2d 94 ; Application of Ashbaugh, 1949, 173 F.2d 273, 274 , 36 C.C.P.A., Patents, 902. Under the circumstances, there is no error in the judgment of the District Court.

Dock Builders v. National Labor Relations Board

505 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1974

P 10,065 DOCK BUILDERS, SHORERS, HOUSE MOVERS, PILE DRIVERS AND FOUNDATION WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 1456, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. … PER CURIAM: 1 This is a petition to review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board in an unfair labor practice proceeding in which the Board found that the Dock Builders Union 1 was in violation of 8(b)

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

646 F.2d 616 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1981

Just as that is a vital consideration in determining the validity of a no-solicitation rule, see Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, at 797-798 [ 65 S.Ct. at 985 ]; Labor Board v. … Co. v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

417 F.2d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1969

NLRB v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 309 U.S. 206, 226 , 60 S.Ct. 493, 503 , 84 L.Ed. 704 (1940). … We * * * [found] their use unobjectionable and within the competence of the Board.” United Steelworkers of America v. NLRB, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 260 , 263, 393 F.2d 661 , 664 (1968).

Wisconsin Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

589 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1978

589 F.2d 734 191 U.S.App.D.C. 211 Wisconsin Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System No. 78-1083 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/27/78 1 B.G.F.R.S. 2 REMANDED *

Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild, Local 82 v. National Labor Relations Board

877 F.2d 998 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1989

See NLRB v. Food Fair Stores, Inc., 307 F.2d 3, 14 (3d Cir.1962). The “membership” that can be required as a condition of employment is thus “whittled down to its financial core.” NLRB v. … Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), to a Board interpretation of ambiguous statutory language so long as its construction is “rational and consistent with the statute,” NLRB v.